Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Filozofia slow jest odpowiedzią na potrzebę zwolnienia i bardziej refleksyjnego patrzenia na różne obszary ludzkiej aktywności. Przejawem jej rozpowszechnienia jest rozwój międzynarodowej sieci miast Cittaslow, do której należy już 28 polskich miast. W artykule omówiono główne cechy i uwarunkowania procesu rewitalizacji w miastach Cittaslow. Zwrócono uwagę na zintegrowane planowanie rewitalizacji, która zależy od poziomu znajomości i akceptacji idei slow wśród mieszkańców, przedsiębiorców i lokalnych liderów oraz współpracy miast w sieci (tzw. koopetycji).
EN
The philosophy of slow is a response to the need to slow down and more reflective look at various areas of human activity. A manifestation of its prevalence is the development of international network of Cittaslow, which already includes 28 Polish cities. The article discusses the main features and determinants of the revitalization process in the cities of Cittaslow. Attention is paid to integrated revitalization planning, which depends on the level of knowledge and acceptance of the slow idea among inhabitants, entrepreneurs and local leaders and cooperation of cities in the network (the so-called coopetition).
EN
The objective of this study was to describe the level of innovation in urban revitalization projects in the Region of Warmia and Mazury and to determine whether urban renewal projects foster a supportive climate for business innovation in the region. Most revitalization programs rely on the following innovative solutions: new sources of financing, creativity of the operator supervising the revitalization process, novel methods for soliciting the local community's support for urban renewal projects, and the establishment of technology parks that foster business innovation. Revitalization projects stimulate innovation among local entrepreneurs and residents, they promote urban development based on a local innovation system, knowledge and social capital, and encourage the implementation of the smart city model where innovations are diffused from a revitalized area to other parts of the city.
|
2012
|
vol. 7
|
issue 2
289-299
EN
This paper identifies the major factors that are the conditions for implementation of local urban area revitalisation programmes. Studies conducted in selected towns of the province of Warmia and Mazury showed that the availability of own and external funding for project implementation, accumulation of social problems in the areas subject to revitalisation, the size and diversity of entities involved in the revitalisation process and the lack of comprehensive legal regulations concerning revitalisation process organisation (absence of the Act on Revitalisation) were the most important factors influencing the revitalisation processes among those implementing and coordinating the programmes.
EN
The aim of this study was to identify the factors, determinants and barriers in the development of slow cities in Poland, with special attention paid to those connected with specific features of the slow city model and membership in the Cittaslow network. The research subject was the factors and determinants of the development of member cities of the Polish National Cittaslow Network. All analyses and conclusions were mainly based on a critical examination of the literature. An identification of determinants and factors involved in the development of slow cities in Poland was made, including the division of them into local, regional, national, international and global categories. Attention was drawn to the determinants of implementing the slow city model connected with the contemporary paradigm of the development of cities, which should be considered in the management of slow cities in Poland.
PL
Celem badań była identyfikacja czynników, uwarunkowań i barier rozwoju slow cities w Polsce, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem tych, które wiążą się z cechami modelu slow city i członkostwem w sieci Cittaslow. Przedmiotem badań były czynniki i uwarunkowania rozwoju miast należących do Polskiej Krajowej Sieci Miast Cittaslow. Analizę i wnioskowanie przeprowadzono głównie poprzez krytyczną analizę piśmiennictwa. Dokonano identyfikacji uwarunkowań i czynników rozwoju slow cities o charakterze lokalnym, regionalnym, krajowym, międzynarodowym i globalnym. Zwrócono uwagę na uwarunkowania implementacji modelu slow city związane ze współczesnym paradygmatem rozwoju miast, które to uwarunkowania powinny być uwzględniane w procesie zarządzania slow cities w Polsce.
PL
Celem badań była ocena poziomu samodzielności ekonomicznej i jej wpływu na kształtowanie się zmian ustrojowych w różnych grupach samorządów terytorialnych. Badania wykazały, że czynnikiem decydującym o zróżnicowaniu stopnia samodzielności ekonomicznej samorządów jest poziom urbanizacji. Dochody własne w samorządach miejskich przekraczają 50%, a nawet 60%, natomiast na terenach wiejskich (rozumianych jako gminy wiejskie oraz powiaty ziemskie) kształtują się na poziomie ok. 30%. Tak poważne różnice mogą wpływać na to, że rozwój samorządów terytorialnych będzie odbywał się w dwóch – ustrojowo różnych – kierunkach.
EN
The aim of our research is to evaluate the level of economic independence and its influence on political system changes in different groups of local government. The research shows that the decisive factor in differentiating economic independence of local governments is the level of urbanization. In urban self-government, its own revenues surpass 50% and sometimes even 60%, whereas in rural areas (defined as rural communes and land districts) they reach about 30%. Such marked differences can cause local governments to develop in two structurally different directions.
EN
The objective of the study is characteristics of two development concepts of modern cities, i.e. smart city and slow city, and showing the possibilities of combining them in the proposed slow city model, drawing upon the assumptions of a smart city, which was determined as the smart slow city. Conclusions mainly rely on the performed reference literature studies (using the critical literature review method), which allowed for a synthetic presentation of the characteristics of the two discussed models of development, which are the basis for an independent description of the city model that unites these two approaches. The comparison of city development models was made on the basis of the following characteristics: the genesis of the city development idea, the rate of changes and the model of life related to it, key city development factors, the main objective of changes, key actors, activity areas, specialisation, scale of urban centres, city image, level of development policy, significance of cooperation, determinants or limitations in the implementation of the city development concept. Such an attempt of combining, by modern cities, of the potential offered by two development concepts (smart city and slow city), may contribute to the creation of an image of a modern city, the so-called smart slow city which, as a member of the Cittaslow network, considers the quality of residents' life as a priority, and uses modern technological solutions.
7
51%
EN
The purpose of this article has been to present the history of the Polish National Cittaslow Network, to discuss its development and to draw the attention to the diversity of network member cities. The authors emphasise the fact that the Polish National Cittaslow Network is developing very dynamically, and is the second largest network of Cittaslow in the world. Today, it is composed of 28 cities, of which 20 lie in the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship. Other two centers are currently in the process of joining the network. The member cities are diverse in terms of their size as well as environmental or cultural assets. They are also diverse in terms of the level of socio-economic development. There are such cities in the network whose level of entrepreneurship, measured by the number of private sector businesses per 1,000 residents, is much higher than the average for the whole network (Rzgów, Murowana Goślina), but there are also cities with a very low level of entrepreneurship (Rejowiec Fabryczny, Jeziorany). Despite the differences, the cities associated in the network share the same concept and pursue shared aims in order to improve the quality of life for their inhabitants. They are proponents of implementing pro-social and pro-environmental measures, while striving to preserve the unique character of each of these cities.
EN
International cooperation between cities is conducted in numerous spheres, including economic, social, and cultural. It is determined by various factors such as the similarities and previous interrelations between cities, a desire to exchange good practices for management and quality of life improvement and by economic conditions. An example of international cooperation between cities is the Cittaslow network. The aim of this article is to present the concept of international cooperation between cities based on the example of the cities of the Cittaslow network and to identify the determinants and benefits of such cooperation. The Cittaslow network is an affiliation of over 230 cities from all over the world. The reason for their cooperation is the similarities between them, in this case, with respect to their size and the development model they have adopted. Within the Cittaslow network, cooperation takes place between small cities which want to grow in accordance with the “slow” movement principles and make such cooperation very advantageous for the following spheres: environmental, social, economic and spatial.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.