Search results

1

Amor fati Fryderyka Nietzschego (konieczność i przypadkowość losu człowieka)

100%

Pałasiński P.

Racjonalia. Z punktu widzenia humanistyki

|

2013

|

vol. 3

EN

This article is about the concept of amor fati in the Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy. In philosophy of Beyond Good and Evil the author’s idea of amor fati combines reflections on fortuitousness and necessity in the context of human life. In this paper, the author attempts to show the significance of this idea by the interpretation of Nietzsche’s statements about the following concepts: fortuitousness and necessity. The other issue is Nietzsche’s writing about his own attitude to life and the world. The amor fati idea appear to be an existential challenge that Nietzsche confronts with people who want to see their life as meaningful. By Nietzsche fortuitousness as the essence of the world is subordinate to the human life requiring the purpose. The amor fati concept appears as one way of life in the world without purpose.

PL

This article is about the concept of amor fati in the Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy. In philosophy of Beyond Good and Evil the author’s idea of amor fati combines reflections on fortuitousness and necessity in the context of human life. In this paper, the author attempts to show the significance of this idea by the interpretation of Nietzsche’s statements about the following concepts: fortuitousness and necessity. The other issue is Nietzsche’s writing about his own attitude to life and the world. The amor fati idea appear to be an existential challenge that Nietzsche confronts with people who want to see their life as meaningful. By Nietzsche fortuitousness as the essence of the world is subordinate to the human life requiring the purpose. The amor fati concept appears as one way of life in the world without purpose.

2

Powieść в Советском союзе не было аддерола Olgi Breininger z perspektywy posthumanizmu

80%

Stryjakowska A.

Kultury Wschodniosłowiańskie - Oblicza i Dialog

|

2019

|

issue 9

149-155

EN

The analysis focuses on the novel’s protagonist – a young woman who gets involved in an experiment that is aimed at creating the contemporary Übermensch. It is claimed that the novel can be interpreted from the perspective of posthumanism, as it questions the anthropocentric standpoint, which refers mainly to the intellectual dimension of the human being and its economic efficiency.

3

Nazistowskie wodzostwo w świetle paradygmatu nadczłowieka Fryderyka Nietzschego

71%

Chmiel D.

Horyzonty Polityki

|

2012

|

vol. 3

|

issue 5

251-272

PL

Niniejszy artykuł stanowi próbę diagnozy historycznego fenomenu nazistowskiej idei wodzostwa podjętą z perspektywy antropozofii Fryderyka Nietzschego, której ukoronowaniem jest projekt nadczłowieka. Posługujac się analizą kulturowych, historycznych oraz psychospołecznych uwarunkowań bytu społeczeństwa niemieckiego, traktuje tenże projekt jako filozoficzne tło, na którym zarysowuje polityczny profil wodza III Rzeszy. Celem tego zabiegu jest próba wskazania ideowych zniekształceń pomiędzy koncepcją „przełomowości” narodowosocjalistycznej rewolucji a ahistorycznie pojmowaną zasadą immoralistycznego przełomu ujawnioną w nietzscheańskim postulacie „przewartościowania wszystkich wartości”. Wyniki tychże obserwacji zostają przedstawione w dwóch, jak się okazuje, zasadniczo odmiennych koncepcjach człowieka jako podmiotu działania społeczno-politycznego.

4

Wina i sumienie. Komentarz etyczny do epilogu Zbrodni i kary Fiodora Dostojewskiego

71%

Wierzbicki A. M.

Filozofia Chrześcijańska

|

2012

|

vol. 9

39-50

EN

Dostoyevsky’s famous novel Crime and Punishment can be interpreted as an argument with Nietzsche’s view on the genealogy of conscience. While Nietzsche believes that conscience is a product of a disease and inhibits the will to power, Dostoevsky shows the situation of crossing the border as a source of moral illness and self-destruction of the human person. Crime andPunishment, as well as Dostoevsky’s novel Demons and The Trial of F. Kafka, also criticize modern and postmodern society, in which there is a strong trend, stimulated by psychoanalysis, to liberate people from guilt. With reference to Martin Buber’s views, the author of the article formulatesa thesis on the ontological nature of guilt, treating its confession as a necessary act of self-enlightenment in conscience.Examining the structure of conscience in the context of guilt, a deeper level must be indicated, called synderesis in the scholastic tradition. Considering the elements of experience present in the experience of conscience, the author criticizes the intellectualist interpretation of synderesis. He takes into account the deep level of understanding of conscience in the category of heart made by D. v. Hildebrand and the anamnesis category of J. Ratzinger.

PL

Dostoyevsky’s famous novel Crime and Punishment can be interpreted as an argument with Nietzsche’s view on the genealogy of conscience. While Nietzsche believes that conscience is a product of a disease and inhibits the will to power, Dostoevsky shows the situation of crossing the border as a source of moral illness and self-destruction of the human person. Crime and Punishment, as well as Dostoevsky’s novel Demons and The Trial of F. Kafka, also criticize modern and postmodern society, in which there is a strong trend, stimulated by psychoanalysis, to liberate people from guilt. With reference to Martin Buber’s views, the author of the article formulates a thesis on the ontological nature of guilt, treating its confession as a necessary act of self-enlightenment in conscience.Examining the structure of conscience in the context of guilt, a deeper level must be indicated, called synderesis in the scholastic tradition. Considering the elements of experience present in the experience of conscience, the author criticizes the intellectualist interpretation of synderesis. He takes into account the deep level of understanding of conscience in the category of heart made by D. v. Hildebrand and the anamnesis category of J. Ratzinger.

5

Nietzsche i teologia

57%

Paluch M.

Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne

|

2017

|

vol. 30

|

issue 2

142-160

EN

The paper attempts to propose a Christian reaction to the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. The first part is a concise reconstruction of his anthropological project, undertaken on the basis of his later works. The second part presents the main reasons for the attractiveness of his work and the context in which it was written. In the last part, partly with some reference to Max Scheler’s Ressentiment and Christian Morality, the author sketches the framework of the Christian answer. (1) Placing of the idea of the fullness of new life in the center of Christian soteriology, (2) recognizing the merciful love of God to human beings as an expression of the divine perfection and power and (3) looking for new convincing descriptions of the ways to the divine transcendence against a background of the experiences of self-transcendence (eros and thanatos) are the main elements of the adequate Christian reaction to the proposal of the German philosopher.

Refine search results

1 Filozofia Chrześcijańska

1 Horyzonty Polityki

1 Kultury Wschodniosłowiańskie - Oblicza i Dialog

1 Racjonalia. Z punktu widzenia humanistyki

1 Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne

1 Chmiel D.

1 Paluch M.

1 Pałasiński P.

1 Stryjakowska A.

1 Wierzbicki A. M.

1 2019

1 2017

1 2013

2 2012

Amor fati Fryderyka Nietzschego (konieczność i przypadkowość losu człowieka)

Powieść в Советском союзе не было аддерола Olgi Breininger z perspektywy posthumanizmu

Nazistowskie wodzostwo w świetle paradygmatu nadczłowieka Fryderyka Nietzschego

Wina i sumienie. Komentarz etyczny do epilogu Zbrodni i kary Fiodora Dostojewskiego

Nietzsche i teologia