Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  św. Marek
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Artykuł ma na celu uzasadnienie tezy, iż wplecenia narracyjne w Ewangelii św. Marka są zabiegiem ukazującym dogłębne zaangażowanie teologiczne ewangelisty. Zabieg ten zdefiniować można jako powiązanie ze sobą dwóch linii narracji w układ A1BA2, który poprzez zastosowanie środków, takich jak równoczesność, kontrast, ironia, podobieństwo i tym podobne przekazuje całkowicie nowe znaczenie obu historii. Sześć wpleceń z Ewangelii św. Marka – 3,20–35, 5,21–43, 6,7–31, 11,21–23, 14,1–11 oraz 14,53–72 – łączą różne sceny z konkretnymi zamysłami natury teologicznej i jako takie nie mogą być sprowadzone do kategorii zabiegu literackiego lub redakcyjnego. Wszystkie one krążą dookoła najważniejszych problemów Markowej teologii, takich jak chrystologia, szczególnie w nawiązaniu do cierpienia, wymagania względem prawdziwego ucznia Jezusa, wizja przyszłej wspólnoty kościelnej. W swoich wpleceniach narracyjnych św. Marek wyjawia swoją rozbudowaną, wyrazistą teologię, jak również oryginalność i mistrzostwo w prowadzeniu narracji.
EN
This paper aims at evidencing the thesis that Markan interpretative intercalations are a narrative structure that manifests profound theological engagement of the evangelist. This device is defined as an entanglement of two storylines in the A1–B–A2 pattern which by using the notions of simultaneity, contrast, irony, similarity, etc. offers a wholly novel meaning of the stories. Six intercalations of the St Mark’s gospel – 3 : 20–35; 5 : 21–43; 6 : 7–31; 11 : 12–23; 14 : 1–11, 53–72 – merge different episodes with distinct theological purposes and as such cannot be reduced to the rank of a literary or redactional device. All of them are concerned with the most essential topics of the Markan theology, such as Christology, especially in relation to suffering, requirements of true discipleship, vision of the future ecclesiastical community. St Mark in his intercalations reveals his elaborated, clear-cut theology, as well as narrative ingenuity and mastery.
EN
The history of Christianity in Cyprus has a long and beautiful tradition, whose beginnings are connected with four important figures: Saint Lazarus and apostles Paul, Barnabas and Mark. The apostles came to Cyprus in the first half of the 1st century, when the island was under the Roman rule. According to tradition, by preaching God’s Word they became the founders of the Cypriot Church. Their mission was not an easy one, and the pressure of the indignant Jewish community led to the capture of Paul in Paphos and his consequent whipping at the whipping post. The post can still be seen today among the ruins of the church of Agia Kyriaki Chrysopolitissa. Barnabas sacrificed his life for his faith: he was captured in Salamis, and then burnt at the stake by a Jewish mob. Roman Proconsul Quintus Sergius Paulus became the first important Roman official who converted to Christianity, and Cyprus became the first Roman province which adopted Christianity. Tradition also links Saint Lazarus with the island: allegedly, after being miraculously resurrected by Jesus in Bethany, he came to Cyprus, where he became a bishop and where he preached God’s Word and converted pagans into Christianity for the next 30 years.
PL
Historia chrześcijaństwa na Cyprze posiada długą i piękną tradycję, a jej początki są związane z czterema ważnymi dla kościoła postaciami: św. Łazarza oraz apostołów Pawła, Barnaby oraz Marka. W pierwszej połowie I wieku n.e. na Cypr, pozostający pod panowaniem rzymskim, przybyli apostołowie Paweł, Barnaba i Marek, którzy głosząc Słowo Boże stali się w myśl tradycji założycielami Kościoła cypryjskiego. Misja ta nie była łatwa, a presja oburzonej gminy żydowskiej, spowodowała, że Paweł został pojmany w Pafos i ukarany biczowaniem, przywiązany do pręgierza, który do dzisiaj można oglądać wśród ruin bazyliki Agia Kyriaki Chrysopolitissa. Barnaba poświęcił swoje życie. Został pojmany w Salamis, a następnie spalony na stosie przez żydowski tłum. Tradycja łączy również z wyspą Łazarza, który po cudownym wskrzeszeniu przez Jezusa w Betanii, przybył na Cypr głosić Słowo Boże, gdzie mieszkańcy obrali go biskupem i przez następne 30 lat nauczał i nawracał pogan na chrześcijaństwo.
EN
The author proposes an interpretation of the pericope of Matt 1,18-25 that emphasizes some Mariological aspects in the context of the first canonical Gospel.The author attests to the fact that the virgin birth of Mary is not given any special justification in Matt 1,18-25 nor is it an object of any special theological reflection because the pericope in question (Matt 1,18-25) is a self-contained narrative in which St. Matthew depicts the birth of Jesus as an exceptional event in the economy of salvation. And he does so for two reasons: because the virgin birth itself as well as the whole presented event (cf. Matt 1,22) is a fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecy of Is 7,14 (cf. Matt 1,22b-23) and because the fact that Mary conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit becomes a logical ground for acknowledging Jesus as the Son of God. Nevertheless, the Evangelist also allows for the Mariological theme in a very special way.The author of the article reaches a number of crucial Mariological conclusions which are the guiding ideas of his research, i.e. that in Matt 1,18-25 Mary is portrayed even more expressively than in the pericope presenting the genealogy of Jesus (Matt 1,1-17 especially Matt 1,16). St. Matthew depicts Mary as a remarkable person, very significant in the fulfillment of God’s plan of saving humanity. Mary plays an invaluable role in the pericope of Matt 1,18-25. Since the times of the prophet Isaiah she was the chosen Virgin who would give birth to the Emmanuel. Thus, she can be described as a mediator of God’s actions in His plan of saving all humanity. But in Matt 1,18-25 St. Matthew does not mention any personal deeds of Mary.The author attests to the fact that Mary is the virgin and immaculate Mother of Jesus, the Messiah, the Christ, Son of David and Son of God. This leads to a conclusion that Mary is the Mother of the Emmanuel. And because her motherhood is the result of the Holy Spirit’s action (Matt 1,18.20) the Church owes to her the Master, the Son of God who stands by the Church “always, [even] unto the end of the world” (Matt 28,20).Keywords
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.