Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: посткоммунизм

Sort By:

Limit search:

Między postkomunizmem a postmodernizmem. Najnowszy dramat rosyjski w poszukiwaniu tożsamości kulturowej

100%

Mięsowska L.

Miscellanea Posttotalitariana Wratislaviensia

2016

vol. 4: POKOLENIE — TRANSFORMACJA — TOŻSAMOŚĆ Gardzienickie czytania teatroznawcze… i nie tylko

59-77

Russian drama after 1991, suspended between memory and oblivion, attempts to process an overwhelming trauma of its own tragic history. Evgeny Grishkovets, Vladimir Sorokin, Ludmila Petrushevskaya, Alexey Shipenko, Oleg Bogayev, Vasily Sigarev, the Presnyakov brothers, Ivan Vyrypaev and others show experiences preceding and following Perestroika and demonstrate the scale of traumatic consequences of old structures disintegration as well as dangers connected with entering the area of freedom. This way Russian drama underwent all the development stages ranging from admiration for freedom to its negation, all the time without losing an interest in the internal man. Therefore criticism of the communist ideology as a kind of utopia and visions showing the risk of the rebirth of totalitarianism in Russia coexist along with the stream of consciousness depicting what is happening in the soul of a contemporary Russian. The process of self-identification of the human being that is decentralised, standardised and attached to stereotypes of mass awareness takes place within the framework of postmodernist mixture of stylistics and aesthetics, deconstruction of the reality and the language, play with culture codes, which is most fully expressed through the ongoing process of searching for cultural identity of the discussed works.

Modernizacja czy kolonizacja? Recepcja okresu radzieckiego w polityce historycznej Kazachstanu i Uzbekistanu

80%

Kuryłowicz M.

Nowa Polityka Wschodnia

2017

vol. 4(15)

167-189

The article describes the politics of memory of the Soviet Union in post-soviet Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan (1991–2016). The analysis is based on the following documents: Presidents N. Nazarbaev and I. Karimov statements, their publications, the politics of commemoration and historical education in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan after 1991. Author tries to compare two national historical narrations over the Soviet regime and argues that Uzbeks and Kazakhs were used two different approach of criticism of soviet colonialism, related to their foreign policy towards Russia

Статья описывает формирование исторической политики в отношении Со- ветского Союза в Казахстане и Узбекистане (1991–2016). Анализ базируется на нижеследующих источниках: выступлениях президентов Н. Назарбаева и И. Каримова, написанных ими книгах, коммеморативной политике в Ка- захстане и Узбекистане и историческом образовании в этих республиках по- сле 1991 года. Автор пытается сравнить две исторические наррации в отно- шении советского режима, приходя к выводу, что они расходятся в критике советского колониализма. Одновременно эти разные наррации тесно связа- ны с внешней политикой этих стран в отношении России.

Refine search results

1 Miscellanea Posttotalitariana Wratislaviensia

1 Nowa Polityka Wschodnia

1 Kuryłowicz M.

1 Mięsowska L.

1 2017

1 2016

Search results

Między postkomunizmem a postmodernizmem. Najnowszy dramat rosyjski w poszukiwaniu tożsamości kulturowej

Modernizacja czy kolonizacja? Recepcja okresu radzieckiego w polityce historycznej Kazachstanu i Uzbekistanu