Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  18th-century theatre
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Théâtres de societé became one of the favourite amusements of aristocracy, noblemen, and wealthy bourgeoisie of the 18th-century France. Some required substantial funding (as in the case of Duchess du Maine or Madame de Pompadour), though they often did without elaborate decorations and sophisticated costumes; nearly always they were organised by women, nearly always in connection with activities of their salons. The newfound passion for private theatres, organised with the audience of friends in mind, contributed to the weakening of the hierarchical structure of French society. Actors, often giving lessons in acting (and even acting with the powerful and privileged amateurs on stage) became guests of refined and sophisticated salons; discussions between aristocrats and playwrights, who composed some of their plays specifically with the théâtres de société in mind or simply assisted in staging their plays privately, became more common as well. Contrary to popular belief, théâtres de société were not just empty entertainment; they had an influence on the hierarchical changes within the 18th century society.
EN
The military and economic dominance of France in Europe waned in the 18th century, but paradoxically, that century was also the golden age of cultural influence of France on other countries of the Old World. A large number of courts established theatres that were often perceived as local versions of the Comédie-Française, because they replicated the same model of maintaining close ties between the court and the stage, understood as a place that was supposed to promote and reinforce the official model of civilisation. Yet at the same time, the Comédie-Française as well as other “official stages” of 18th-century France (the Opéra, Comédie-Italienne, and the Opéra-Comique later on) that enjoyed royal support (mostly through monopoly, direct subsidies, and sometimes through preferential terms and conditions of lending theatre halls) became increasingly effective in breaking their ties with Versailles and becoming bourgeois theatres to a larger extent. Growing competition from unlicensed private stages, which had been trying out different ways of circumventing the royal monopolies, forced the officially sanctioned theatres to seek new management solutions and new aesthetics. The search for form was very often obstructed by attempts made by Louis XV and Louis XVI to maintain royal control over the spectacles: though the monarchs themselves were not interested in theatre as such, they introduced a complex system of control and scrutiny. Thus, the official stages had to struggle with criticism from the audiences that demanded change, but they were restricted by organisational decisions being made externally. It was also the time when the conviction about conservatism of officially sanctioned stages, the Comedie-Française in particular, took roots. And though the stage would not, indeed, act as a motor of formal change, the ensemble was not to blame here. Eighteenth-century courts of Europe did not pay attention to the intricacies of the system of ties and connexions (between the court and the bourgeois audience, between the official stages and the unofficial ones) that had been shaping the theatrical life of the French capital of the period. Instead, they mostly relied on simplified and obsolete 17th-century beliefs about the theatre at the French court, while the theatre on the Seine was entering a completely new phase of development.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.