Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  2 List do Koryntian
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article aims to answer the question of how in the history of exegesis the statement of the Apostle Paul from 2 Cor 5:21a (“God made Christ a sin”) was interpreted. The article consists of several parts examining the issue chronologically. At the beginning the interpretation of 2 Cor. 5:21a by theologians of the Patristic era (esp. Origen, Cyril of Alexandria, Gregory of Nazianzus; Gregory of Nyssa, John Chrysostom, and Augustine of Hippo) was presented. Then, the interpretation by medieval theologians (esp. Anselm of Canterbury) was discussed. In the third stage the understanding of 2 Cor 5:21a by Martin Luther, Jan Calvin, and other theologians of the Reformation era has been examined. The last step is the presentation of the interpretation of 2 Cor 5:21a during the modern era. It has been noticed that contemporary exegetes refer to the results of the theologians who lived before. In the interpretation of 2 Cor 5:21a, the three most important tendencies can be distinguished. First of them sees here a reference to the incarnation of the Son of God, the second one-a reference to His death understood as a sacrifice for sin, and the third trend understands making Jesus sin in relation to the reality of sin that Jesus Christ faced.
PL
Autor artykułu szuka odpowiedzi na pytanie, jak w historii egzegezy interpretowano wypowiedź Apostoła Pawła z 2 Kor 5,21a o tym, że Bóg uczynił Chrystusa grzechem. Artykuł składa się z kilku części uszeregowanych chronologicznie. Najpierw przedstawiona została interpretacja 2 Kor 5,21a przez teologów epoki patrystycznej (zwłaszcza Orygenesa, Cyryla Aleksandryjskiego, Grzegorza z Nazjanzu, Grzegorza z Nyssy, Jana Chryzostoma, Augustyna z Hippony). Następnie omówiono teologów średniowiecznych na czele z Anzelmem z Canterbury. Trzecim etapem było zwrócenie uwagi na Marcina Lutra, Jana Kalwina oraz innych teologów czasu Reformacji. Ostatni punkt stanowi ukazanie interpretacji 2 Kor 5,21a przez teologów nowożytnych. Zauważono, że egzegeci epoki nowożytnej w swoich badaniach nawiązują do owoców pracy teologów wcześniej żyjących. W interpretacji 2 Kor 5,21a wyróżnić można trzy najważniejsze tendencje, które widzą tutaj odniesienie do wcielenia Syna Bożego, do Jego śmierci rozumianej jako ofiara za grzech i do szeroko rozumianej rzeczywistości grzechu, z którą zmierzył się Jezus Chrystus.
EN
Human communication, though based mainly on nouns, verbs, and adjectives, would not be precise without minor parts of speech such as adverbs, conjunctions, and particles. In the presented article, the author considered the adverb nyni strengthened by the particle de. Based on five fragments from the epistles to the Corinthians (1 Cor 12:18; 13:13; 15:20; 2 Cor 8:11.22), the meanings of the nyni de were shown. First, assisted by the Greek dictionaries and lexicons, the author examined the proposals of the interpretation of the expression. On the basis of extra-biblical and biblical literature as well as Hellenistic papyri, lexicographers made a clear distinction between its temporal and logical meaning. According to the author, the mentioned distinction is far too radical because, in Paul’s correspondence with the Corinthians, both temporal and logical meanings are present, even in the passages where the notion of time is weaker (1 Cor 13:13; 15:20).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.