Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

POTREBA PRÁVNEJ ÚPRAVY SPRÁVNEHO TRESTANIA NA PRÍKLADE ZÁSADY ZÁKAZU ZMENY K HORŠIEMU

100%
Vačok J.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2017
|
vol. 100
|
issue 5
495 – 502
EN
This contribution points out interpretation problems of present regulation of Administrative Punishment. He analyses national and international regulation especially with reference to the requirements of Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. According to the research findings, the author points out the need the comprehensive regulation of administrative punishment. He also defines the essential problems for solving before the start of the works on the new law.
2

PRIESKUM ROZHODNUTÍ ORGÁNOV PRÁVNICKEJ OSOBY SÚKROMNÉHO PRÁVA V SPRÁVNOM SÚDNICTVE

100%
Csach K.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2022
|
vol. 105
|
issue 1
19 – 33
EN
The Slovak legal system allows for legal entities of private law and their bodies to decide as public administrative bodies. The question whether a decision sanctioning a member of a private law legal entity (civic associations, trade unions, hunting organizations, fishermen’s associations, sports organizations but also companies) is a private law or public law decision is still unresolved. The author describes the legislative development of the judicial review of decisions of private law legal entities. The author sums up the development of the case law of the panel deciding on judicial competence, which limited the competence of the administrative judiciary in the examination of such decisions. The author criticizes the possibility of exercising public power by private entities and explains why the criteria chosen by the recent decision of the panel on judicial competence (R 16/2021) are not appropriate to determine whether the decision of a body of a legal person against its members is an administrative body. It is argued that these criteria are deviating from the legislative text, according to which the decision of a legal person is a decision of public administration only in exceptional cases and under clearly defined conditions.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.