Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ADMINISTRATIVE PUNISHMENT
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This contribution points out interpretation problems of present regulation of Administrative Punishment. He analyses national and international regulation especially with reference to the requirements of Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. According to the research findings, the author points out the need the comprehensive regulation of administrative punishment. He also defines the essential problems for solving before the start of the works on the new law.
EN
The Slovak legal regulation of administrative punishment is in many respects interspersed. The means of applying elements of restorative justice are no exception. The normative diction of the law on misdemeanors, or even another regulation, hardly thinks about them. In the scientific literature to date, there have been several inspiring considerations about the possibilities of modifying this state within the processes of creating the future sanction law of public administration. However, it is not possible to limit the formulation of impulses in the de lege ferenda level, especially in the legal-application context. Administrative authorities apply the applicable law in the process of hearing administrative offenses. Therefore, attention should be paid to methods of strengthening the restorative element in administrative punishment in the light of an effective normative platform. The examination of these aspects is the subject of a translated article. The author focuses on whether the categories of the general theory of law (interpretation, the legal imperative of analogy, subsidiarity of legislation) can create space for strengthening the restorative element in administrative punishment. He examines the above, especially in the light of the possibilities of concluding a settlement on a proper tort.
EN
Slovak administrative punishment has long lacked comprehensive legal regulation, both from the point of view of substantive law and procedural law. This results in several interpretive ambiguities. One of the ambiguities in question is related to conciliation in misdemeanour proceedings. Some attention has already been paid to the issue of the possibility of conciliation in criminal proceedings in the current scientific literature. Scientific opinions on the possibilities of resolving a misdemeanour case through reconciliation, excluding the offense of defamation according to § 78 of the Act of the Slovak National Council No. 372/1990 Coll. on offenses as amended, are not uniform and differ. The aim of this contribution is to follow up on the currently produced scientific discourse in the subject area, to develop it substantively and ideologically, and to bring arguments in favour of the possibility of amicable disposal of several cases regulated by the tort law of public administration.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.