Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ADVOCATE
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article describes recent understanding of the advocate in the law-governed state in several historical examples, where positive and also negative experiences of history of Slovakia emphasize relationship between the advocate and the law-governed state and his role there.
EN
Advocate's oath of office is a solemn declaration taken publicly in a prescribed form, by which a new attorney obliges himself both to accomplish properly his professional duties and to respect primary principles of advocate's deontology. The taking of the oath of office is a conditio sine qua non to the admission to commence legal practice. Normative sense of the given institution coexists with its symbolic dimension as a source of attorney's ethics and identity. The article presents institution of advocate's oath of office in the Polish legal order, from 16th century to nowadays. The first mention of the advocate's swearing-in in Poland dates back to the year 1543. Over the span of nearly five centuries the analyzed institution has undergone significant changes. In the interwar period the advocate's oath of office gained the secular dimension. Up to this time the oath nominally had been taken to God, which was verbalised in the following phrase: 'I swear to Almighty God, One in the Holy Trinity'. In the First Polish Republic attorneys took the oath before land courts. Since the Second Polish Republic advocate's oath is taken in the presence of the Dean of District Bar Council. In the times of the Noble Republic of Poland the text of advocate's oath of office was more and more extensive and casuistic. Nowadays it articulates only rudimentary principles of lawyer's deontology. Subsequent versions of the oath's text starting from the 1932 Law on the Advocates' Profession did not differ radically, embracing similar rules governing advocate's professional practice. After Second World War the text of advocate's oath, in contrary to oaths of office of polish judges and prosecutors, avoided political ideologization. Currently new member admitting to the Bar swears to use all his strength to protect citizens' rights and freedoms, to strengthen the legal order of the Republic of Poland, to perform his duties eagerly, conscientiously and in accordance with the provisions of law, to protect professional secrets and to conduct himself with dignity, honesty, propriety and according to the principles of social justice. The course of taking the advocate's oath of office is a result of customary practice of the Bar. Advocates recite the oath's words collectively. One can put into consideration change of this swearing-in manner, so that new advocates may declaim the oath's words one at a time. The proposed solution would increase the solemnity of the swearing-in ceremony. The paper ends with some de lege ferenda remarks. There is a need to provide in a statute the possibility of completing advocate's swearing-in with the words 'So help me God'. One should also place a referral to the advocate's oath of office in the Advocates' Code of Ethics. The author of the article in care of legal certainty and security postulates also to determine unequivocally on a statute level a few further issues, such as consequences of the oath's infringement or sanctions for refusing to take the oath (removal from the list of advocates).
3
Content available remote

PRÁVO NA OBHAJOBU V KANONICKÉM TRESTNÍM PROCESU

86%
Studia theologica
|
2013
|
vol. 15
|
issue 2
153–167
EN
The article summarizes the options for the right to defence in the penal canonical process. The right to defence is one of the fundamental rights of believers. The relevant norms of the Code of Canon Law are to be found both in the part concerning the basic rights and obligations of believers, as well as in the part concerning the procedures. The requirement for the public good of the Church clearly states the need to allow this right of defence to be exercised in order to guarantee the fairness of the process and any imposition of a penalty. A violation of the rights to defence may cause irreparable defect to the invalidity of the judgement. The right to defence is guaranteed in the penal process particularly by the compulsory service of an advocate, the right of the accused to be heard and the right to object in the process of the trial.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.