Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  AMENDMENTS
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2013
|
vol. 58
|
issue 4 (351)
123-134
EN
The Act of 3 December 2010 on amendments to the Act – Administrative Proceedings Code and the Act – Law on Administrative Court Proceedings, has modified the scope of categories of employees of an administrative body who are subject, by law, to the exclusion from administrative proceedings related to cases in which they participated. Still, the new shape of the provision was introduced without defining ‘an employee’ that should be ‘excluded’. In his article, the author analyses the judicature of administrative courts and verdicts of the Constitutional Tribunal in this regard, and he observes that the basic legal problem that calls for an interference of the legislator has been the definition of the legal status of a person that performs the functions of a monocratic administrative body.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2012
|
vol. 57
|
issue 5(346)
100-109
EN
The article describes the most important issues related to the appointment of a director of a cultural institution, and to concluding an agreement on managing a cultural institution that stem from the recent amendments to the act on organising and conducting cultural activities. In January 2012, the amendments introduced a division into artistic institutions and other non-artistic institutions of culture. The rules for appointing the heads of these entities have been diversified, too. The article also presents, among others, an analysis of transitional regulations, i.e. the legal status of directors of cultural institutions appointed before the act came into force. The author also discusses an opportunity to employ heads of such institutions on the basis of a civil-law agreement on managing an institution of culture, to which, however, the public procurement law will be now applied.
EN
The state of legal system in Slovakia is subject of long-term criticism, not only by lawyers, but also generally by public, by the addressees of the law. They feel that laws are created in a process that is distant and inaccessible for them. Role of the State is to strengthen citizen ś confidence in law, open the legislative process and make it transparent. In 2015, two laws were adopted relating to the preparation and drafting of laws and parliamentary discussion about proposed laws. The present paper deals with the amendment to the rules of procedure of the Parliament in 2015. It takes note of the changes relating to the publication of the proposed laws and amendments. The paper understands it as a deepening of the Principles of Sovereignty of the People in the activity of the Parliament. The second area is the analysis of Rule prohibiting Amendments that bear no connection with the proposed law, which the paper assesses as a major benefit of the Amendment to the Rules of Procedure of Parliament in 2015.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.