Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Administrative Law
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the article we prove that the sphere of the implementation of law enforcement functions of the state is one of the most important areas that need proper administrative and legal regulation. Achievement of proper functioning of the law enforcement sphere is possible as a result of improvement of the implementation of law enforcement functions of the state by improving the efficiency of each of its components. The administrative and legal mechanism of the implementation of the law-enforcement functions of the state is defined as the totality of administrative and legal means, the use of which creates the conditions necessary for effective activity of the relevant executive authorities implementing law-enforcement functions of the state that, as a result, should lead to appropriate levels of safety and protection of fundamental rights of man and citizens, to a reduction in criminalization of society, and to improvement of public confidence in law-enforcement agencies. Establishment and functioning of effective administrative and legal mechanisms help ensure the proper implementation of law-enforcement functions of the state, implementation of effective influence on social relations that arise in the field of law enforcement, the establishment of effective interaction between the state and citizens, which is the accepted standard of public administration in all democratic countries. One of the key elements of administrative and legal mechanism in the implementation of law-enforcement functions of the state are the principles of the implementation of law-enforcement functions of the state, which establish the basic requirements of the relevant executive authorities in the sphere of the implementation of law-enforcement functions of the state. In defining the term “principles of law-enforcement functions of the state”, the main principles of law-enforcement functions of the state include the following: supremacy of law, the rule of law, the priority of ensuring the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, the equality of citizens before the law (prohibition of discrimination); prohibition of abuse of power, competence and professionalism, transparency and openness, mutual responsibility of the state and mankind. The content of the basic principles of law-enforcement functions of the state is presented. Compliance with the principles of law-enforcement functions of the state will increase the confidence of institutions of civil society to the executive authorities, increase the legal security of citizens and promote dialogue between society and government.
EN
In spite of the lack of the specific statutory competence, a commune secretary, similarly to a district secretary and a secretary of a self-governing province play a specific part in functioning of each commune office, a district starosty and the office of the Marshal respectively. The secretaries are in general treated as office directors that guarantee the continuity in functioning one of the most important local government organizational units. It is mainly the result of the fact that a secretary office is not elected as opposed to an office of a commune head (mayor of a town), a perfect of a district and a province marshal. It is certainly a reason why in the literature a secretary is also called “the first officer” as it happens in some Western European countries. While estimating this office in the present legal status, it is necessary to indicate that making thorough amendments of the law rules that regulate the legal position of a secretary e.g. by introducing this office at the level of the self-government in the province, changing the procedure of establishing an employment relationship with a person to held this position and changing the way of his/her remunerating, the legislator has differentiated some of tasks and duties of commune and district secretaries as well as province secretaries in an unjustified way. The reasons of it should be found in the lack of the amendment of previous regulations in force concerning only at first commune and district secretaries. The baseless lack of competence of a province secretary for drawing up an allographic will pursuant to art. 951 § 1 of the Civil Code or his/her exclusion from the list of entities obliged to make revision statements pursuant to the act of 18th October 2006 on revealing information about documents of safety authorities in the state in the years 1944 - 1990 and the contents of these documents can serve as examples. The above mentioned issues should be changed immediately.
EN
There is a positive aspect of the putting by legislator the wide tasks in the social sphere of upbringing in sobriety and counteracting alcoholism on the gminas. However it is a pity that with reference to poviat and regional self-governments legislator did not follow the idea of involving other levels of the self-government in performing these tasks, taking into consideration the peculiarity of poviat and regional self-governments. The Authors suggest, however, that there are explicit needs emerging in this area. Moreover, Authors formulate a large amount of criticism directed against the Act on upbringing in the sobriety and counteracting alcoholism as a legal act forming the basis for performing tasks of self-government units in the social sphere of upbringing in the sobriety and counteracting alcoholism. First and foremost, they indicate lack of precision, numerous legal loopholes and legislative chaos caused by subsequent legal amendments. Moreover, they emphasize lack of correlation with other acts concerning addictions and addicts, including the Act on counteracting the drug addiction. Thirdly, they show that imposing tasks of this sphere only to a small extent on the poviat self-government causes a breach in the system of reacting to social problems in which in other spheres poviat administration is significantly involved (e.g. welfare). Fourthly, they formulate a more general thesis that the legislator does not have a clear concept of the participation of the public administration, including territorial self-government, in solving and counteracting alcohol problems. It seems that a comprehensive analysis of the social sphere of the problem of addictions (including alcohol addictions) is the method for resolving this problem. Besides, one should consider formulating tasks for public administration (in particular territorial self-government) in one legal act, which may result in consolidating the actions of the administration in the struggle against so difficult and socially dangerous phenomenon of alcoholism and drug addiction.
EN
The paper addresses practical problems relating to the interpretation of unclearprovisions and distinguishing between statutory terms “creditor” and “enforcementagency”, based on an example provided by a decision of the Supreme AdministrativeCourt. The most interesting issue appearing in the aforementioned decision is the needto see a difference between the enforcement agency and the creditor. Alas, it seems thatin practice these two terms are often used alternatively, which is incorrect, or that theprerogatives of one of them are ascribed to the other and vice versa. This is due to the factthat in enforcement proceedings there are situations where the same entity is the creditorand the enforcement agency. Unfortunately, treating an administration agency alternatelyas the creditor and the enforcement agency attests to the lack of understanding of theprovisions of administrative enforcement proceedings, which stems from the fact thatthe issues of administrative enforcement are discussed only rarely, which gives rise to justified concerns and should be changed as soon as possible.
EN
The analysis of the rationing tasks performed by territorial self-government in the economic sphere of counteracting alcoholism points to some conclusions. Various legal means applied to the rationing of trading in alcoholic beverages determining access to alcohol, indicate a considerable role of the gmina self-government and regional self-government in the discussed sphere. This role is not assigned to the poviat self-government in anyway, but to a large extent is related to gminas. On the one hand, there is a positive aspect of the process of passing on the wide competence to the territorial self-government as consistent with the principles of subsidiarity and decentralization that guarantee an important influence on one of the most important branches of social life. On the other hand, we should remember that in this case the trading in alcohol beverages is a special kind of economic activity. In the doctrine there is an opinion that the issue of alcoholism is the nationwide problem, not only the local one. Therefore one should consider whether solving alcohol problems should be assigned to local authorities often remaining under local influence and financial needs of a local pressure group, whose interests may not be consistent with the needs of restrictions on access to alcohol. This contradiction is deepened by imprecise legal expressions and doubts coming from currently binding legal regulations concerning upbringing in sobriety and counteracting alcoholism.
EN
The property value tax has been suggested to introduce in Poland for a long time. However, according to different reasons, reform of the taxation of real estate was not introduced till now. In this article the defects of current property tax structure will be shown. What is more, areas that need reforms will also be pointed out. The benefits of tax in a form of ad valorem will be shown. The introduction of new tax would be an advantage for local government and would also strengthen its position in the state.
EN
The administrative law system covers a vast and complex set of legal standards oriented to archieve the common good, i.e. values specified by law, protected with legal and administrative regulations. Among such values, the protection of cultural objects plays a significant role as a responsibility of the public administration and as the subject of intervention by the public administration, carried out through the application of the administrative law standards. Due to the area and complexity of regulations, the administrative law standards are grouped in specific parts: general, institutional, material and procedural. Issues involving the protection of cultural objects on the ground of administrative law should be placed as one of the comprehensive divisions of the material administrative law; they also include institutional and procedural regulations important for the application of law. Institutions of the administrative law regarding protection of cultural objects should be shaped in such a way so as to guarantee the proper execution of assignments in this field. In particular, this refers to regulations concerning a legal status of museums, which should ensure a possibility for the pursuit of museums’ mission in different social and economic conditions. As part of the development of the study of the administrative law, the matter of the cultural objects’ protection, including issues concerning the legal status of museums, has been perceived and commented upon; nonetheless, further research in this area is called for.
PL
System prawa administracyjnego obejmuje szeroki i złożony zespół norm prawnych ukierunkowanych na realizację dobra wspólnego – określonych przez prawo wartości chronionych regulacją prawno-administracyjną. Wśród tych wartości istotne znaczenie ma ochrona dóbr kultury, jako zadanie administracji publicznej i przedmiot ingerencji administracji publicznej realizowany za pomocą stosowania norm prawa administracyjnego. Ze względu na obszar i komplikację regulacji normy prawa administracyjnego są porządkowane w ramach poszczególnych części: części ogólnej, ustrojowej, materialnej i procesowej. Zagadnienia ochrony dóbr kultury na gruncie prawa administracyjnego należy umiejscowić, jako jeden z kompleksowych działów materialnego prawa administracyjnego, obejmują one również ważne dla stosowania prawa regulacje ustrojowe i procesowe. Instytucje prawa administracyjnego w sferze ochrony dóbr kultury powinny być tak ukształtowane, aby mogły być gwarancją prawidłowej realizacji zadań w tym zakresie. Dotyczy to w szczególności regulacji statusu prawnego muzeów, która powinna zapewniać możliwość realizacji misji muzeów w zamieniających się warunkach społecznych i ekonomicznych. W ramach rozwoju nauki prawa administracyjnegoproblematyka ochrony dóbr kultury, w tym zagadnień statusu prawnego muzeów była dostrzegana i komentowana, jednak istnieje konieczność dalszych badań w tym zakresie.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.