Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Administrative procedure - Polish
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the article there was carried out an analysis was of selected nor-mative changes introduced to the Code of Administrative Procedure in years 2010–2012, from the point of view of their quality. These changes had a differentiated character, their practical mean-ing is also different, however a modification of CAP was made in the greatest scope by the so-called „December amendment”, this is by act of 3 December 2010. on alteration of act – the Code of Administrative Pro-cedure and act – Law on procedure before administrative courts. There are also far-reaching changes and causing doubts concerning their qual-ity, in particular if one takes into account the drafters' intentions formu-lated in reasons of a bill draft, and then he compares with them the final effect (unchanged in the course of further legislative work). A doubt is also risen by a way of introduction of so far-reaching changes of the pro-cedure, which is the most often applied legal act by the public admini-stration.In the above scope the, analysis includes in the first place a change which consists in amending contents of the objective truth principle formulated in art. 7 CAP, in a way intending to activate parties of the procedure. A succeeding amended provision (by the same „December amendment”) to which I allowed to turn attention,, is a change of the contents of art. 24 § 1 point 5 CAP causing extension of a catalogue of employees subject to exception by virtue of the law from participation in the administrative proceedings. A change having a creative character is also a new possibility of supplementing and rectifying a decision ex officio, introduced by added art. 111 § 1a CAP. The legislator also de-cided to introduce a new prerequisite of permissibility of cassation deci-sions making a modification of art. 138 § 2 CAP. In addition I have decided to subject to evaluation an issue of a new obligation, which was imposed by act of 15 July 2011. on change of act – Code of Administrative Procedure and act – Tax Regulations (Dz. U. No. 186, item. 1100). It consists in adding among others art. 66a to CPA, which imposes an obligation to keep a certificate of a case by adminis-trative organs. A new art. 76 a CAP was also analysed, which was added by art. 1 point 2 of act of 23 October 2009 on change of act in the scope of certifi-cation of documents (Dz. U. No. 216,item 1676 with later changes) from 1 January 2010 and determines principles of certifying documents es-sential for adjudication of an administrative case. In the above presented examples of new process regulations one can notice that assumptions of the drafter concerning the object of the amendments and benefits which they are to bring, are not in reality identical with the intended ones.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.