Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Akademia Francuska
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

THE ARGUMENT FROM AUTHORITY IN THE DYNAMICS OF THE FRENCH CLASSIC-ROMANTIC QUARREL (1821–1831)

100%
Sukiennicka M.
Świat Tekstów. Rocznik Słupski
|
2020
|
vol. 18
41-52
PL
Na początku drugiej dekady XIX wieku francuscy klasycy starali się zdyskredytować estetykę romantyzmu, piętnując ją w akademickich mowach jako obcą narodowym wzorcom literackim. Oskarżali oni romantyków o zły smak i brak erudycji, ale argument ten obrócił się przeciwko nim w trakcie sporu, który wywiązał się między reprezentantami dwóch estetyk. Romantycy równie zapalczywie jak klasycy posługiwali się argumentem z autorytetu autorów antycznych. Starali się oni przywłaszczyć sobie dziedzictwo Wergiliusza, Horacego, Boileau i Corneille’a, by ugruntować w ten sposób własną estetykę. Artykuł opisuje retoryczną dynamikę tego odcinka francuskiego sporu klasyków z romantykami i ukazuje, jak autorzy związani z pismem La Muse française usiłowali zająć miejsce klasyków w nowym panteonie pisarzy pełnych klasycznej erudycji, ale też będących wyrazicielami głosu nowej epoki.
EN
In the early 1820s, French classicists tried to discredit the Romantic aesthetics, considering it foreign and anti-national in character. They accused the Romantics of bad taste and lack of classical erudition, but the Romantics turned the accusation against the classicists. In fact, both sides of the ensuing quarrel employed the argument from classical authority. French Romantics appropriated the heritage of ancient and classical literature, relying on Virgil, Horace, Boileau and Corneille in order to legitimate their own aesthetics. This paper describes the rhetorical dynamics of the French classic-Romantic quarrel to demonstrate how the authors from La Muse française were aiming to replace their opponents as actual representatives of erudite and yet modern literature.
2

BOURDIEU 1993 ALBO KONSEKRACJA UCZONEGO STUDIUM PRZYPADKU / Bourdieu 1993: A Case Study in Scientific Consecration

100%
Wacquant L.
Kultura i Społeczeństwo
|
2013
|
vol. 57
|
issue 1
13-27
EN
Drawing on archival materials and personal testimonies, the author reconstructs the conditions under which Bourdieu came to receive the Gold Medal of the National Center for Scientific Research, France’s highest science prize, in 1993 as a signal case study of the existential predicament and institutional trappings of scholarly consecration. Bourdieu’s award speech and the ceremony at which he read it present a triple interest for the history and sociology of sociology. They illustrate how a shaping figure in the discipline personally experienced, reflexively viewed, and practically navigated the nexus of science, authority, and power. Theymark 1993 as a pivot-year in Bourdieu’s intellectual evolution, leading to a new agenda foregrounding the state as paramount symbolic power, the alchemy of group formation, and the unfinished promise of democratic politics; and they help explain why he venturedmore forthrightly into civic debate in the 1990s. Bourdieu’s ambivalent acceptance of the prize also illustrates his conception of the ‘Realpolitik of reason’ and put an emphatic end to the eclipse of Durkheim by restoring sociology to its rightful place at the scientific zenith in the country of its birth.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.