Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help
Authors help
Years help

Results found: 86

first rewind previous Page / 5 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Armenia
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 5 next fast forward last
Vox Patrum
|
2008
|
vol. 52
|
issue 2
871-891
EN
The small village of Akhts at the Southern slopes of Mount Aragats in Armenia preserves the ruins of an extremely interesting temple-sepulchral complex. Its oldest part is the mausoleum of Armenian rulers, mentioned in several historical texts, e.g. in Buzandaran Patmutiwnk (IV 24), or by Moses Khorenats’i (III 27). The complex was erected no later than by the sixth decade of the 4th century; after the year 364, a three-aisled basilica was added to the mausoleum. Both the architecture and the relief decoration have been analysed on numerous occasions (e.g. A. Khatchatrian, or F. Gandolfo, among others).The aspect which still requires a closer analysis, however, is the interpretation of one of the scenes carved on the stone slab closing the Southern arcosolium of the mausoleum (Fig. 10 and 12). The figure of a man fighting a wild boar has been traditionally interpreted as a representation of a hunter or, in the astral-mythic context, as one of the legendary ancestors of the Armenians, Ara the Beautiful (L.A. Dumovo) or Haik-Orion (B.N. Arakeljan). The scene, however, can be also interpreted as a symbolic allusion to the Chris- tianising of Armenia at the beginning of the 4th century. Both the representation of the wild boar, and the figure of the hunter/Ara/Haik can be seen as the same person, king Tiridates III, in two stages of his life: before and after Christianisation. The king’s story has been vividly recounted by Agathangelos. Initially, the ruler was a zealous persecutor of Christians. As a punishment, he was afflicted with lycantrophy: he believed he had been tumed into a wild boar. The only way to recover was to adopt Christianity, which the king did, turning this time into an eąually zealous persecutor of pagans. Therefore, the stone slab in Akhts may represent Tiridates- the Christian fighting his earlier, pagan avatar.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Krzyż armeński - khatchkar

75%
Vox Patrum
|
2001
|
vol. 40
87-98
EN
The author presents early history of the Armenian crosses. The first impuls to rise the khatchkars were the following two factors: the discovery of the Crucifixion Cross by Constantine's mother Helena at the beginnings of 4th century and recovery the Holy Cross by emperor Haraclius in 629. As a result of first fact in the 5th century a feast of the „Invention of the Cross” was introduced to the Church's calendar on the 14th of September.
4
75%
FR
Dans cet article Pauteur apres avoir caracterise en general les oeuvres litteraires de Gregoire de Narek, l'un de plus celebres poetes armeniens, vivant aux X et XI siecles, et apres avoir esquisse l'ambiance intellectuelle du monastere a Narek.
Vox Patrum
|
2001
|
vol. 40
710-712
EN
report
PL
sprawozdanie
Vox Patrum
|
2001
|
vol. 40
712-714
EN
report
PL
sprawozdanie
EN
This article seeks to study the consequences of the Nagorno–Karabakh war for Azerbaijan: thus analyzes findings on occupied territories, casualties, and damages of the war from economic, political, and social perspectives. The utmost brutality and atrocity of the overall conflict is memorized with Khojaly Massacre committed against Azerbaijani civilians on 26 February 1992. Hence, the article unveils evidences through the scrutiny of secondary data from academic sources, publications, and news materials published by international media. The particular focus of the study is concentrated on to what extend special plan was prepared deliberately for ethnic cleansing in Khojaly during the Nagorno–Karabakh war.
EN
In the case of Armenia the armed conflict concerning territorial claims to Nagorno-Karabakh constitutes the key issue. Developing strong executive authority stemmed from the belief that a strong President will handle the difficult period of political and economic transformation. Recent attempts to increase the parliamentarization of Armenia’s political system represent an effort to shape an officially parliamentary, but actually barely changed system preserving the strong position of the chief of state or another decision-making center.
EN
The article deals with the issue of Armenian genocide, which has become a breakthrough in defining national identity for this nation. The history of the memory of the genocide has been described through the prism of various phases of the functioning of the Monument and the Museum of Armenian Genocide in Yerevan. The semantics of this place have been defined in the context of historical memory as well as in relation to contemporary processes related to popular culture
EN
The article reviews the background of Armenia’s decision to join the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) instead of signing an Association Agreement with the European Union. The analysis of the controversies behind that decision and subsequent complications is followed by a review of the economic effects of Armenia’s EEU membership, including the influence of the Russian economic crisis on Armenia. Finally, the article examines the international context and the regional security risks in relation to the different aspects of Armenia’s growing dependence on Russia.
EN
The travel accounts of Simeon of Poland, an Armenian deacon from Lviv, represent one of the most important works of modern Armenian literature. The work does not just record his journey to the Ottoman Empire in the years 1608–1618, but also frequently very detailed and lively description of the life there, during which the author primarily focuses on the everyday life of the Christian minorities. This travel journal is even supplemented at the end with several period colophons that illustrate the situation in Lviv and its close surroundings in the period between the 1620s and 1630s. The article is derived from textual analysis of the primary source, which was written in one of the forms of medieval Armenian. The events included in it are compared with other primary sources from the same period that originated in the region of Central and Eastern Anatolia (particularly from Armenian chroniclers of the so-called Bitlis School). There is particular emphasis placed on analysis of the conditions affecting the members of the Armenian apostolic community in that period as well as descriptions of their everyday lives and relations with their neighbors.
EN
In the paper the author discusses the issues related to the persecution of Jehovah’s Witnesses by the authorities of the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian Apostolic Church, which enjoys the status of the national church. In Armenia Jehovah’s Witnesses are commonly perceived as a „particularly negative sect”. Due to their refusal to perform military service (which is important in the situation of the still not resolved conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh) they are treated as traitors to their own nation. The registration application of Jehovah’s Witnesses was rejected by the authorities fifteen times and despite the & nal success with the registration they still face numerous obstacles which makes it hard to exercise their faith openly. The author’s intention is to raise awareness to the fact that Armenians still demonstrate a negative attitude to all religious minorities, as the re{ ection of the generally prevailing „fear of strangers”. The actions of local TV channels broadcasting current affairs programs in which minorities are shown as enemies to the country and the national unity, can also be blames. Social attitudes explicitly indicate that for Armenians religious diversity constitutes a threat to the ethnic unity. Papers devoted to the freedom of religion published before 2015 show that Jehovah’s Witnesses were the ones particularly persecuted. The blame for such a situation lies to a large extent with the clergy of the Armenian Apostolic Church who encourage locals to defend the national church. The issue of religious minorities is also used in the political struggle. According to some leading Armenian politicians Jehovah’s Witnesses run the policy which is most destructive for Armenia. The blame for the spread of sects in Armenia is put on Western European countries and the United States of America which are believed to & nance sects with the intention to destroy all Orthodox Christian churches that preserve national identity. It is widely believed that America supports sects as it is interested in destabilization of geopolitical situation in the regions close to Russia. The author also tries to find an answer to the question why, despite such unfavorable conditions, Jehovah’s Witnesses in Armenia keep gaining more followers at an increasing rate.
Vox Patrum
|
1983
|
vol. 4
160-175
EN
The principal source to the earliest period of Christian Armenia is the "History" of Agathangelos. His work survives in four versions written in four different languages.
Vox Patrum
|
2001
|
vol. 40
99-110
EN
Das armenische Mónchtum steht im organischen Zusammenhang mit der Geschichte des christiichen Armenien. Zu seiner Entwickiung hat bestimmt der Empfang der Taufe vom Kónig Tiridates III beigetragen. Es drang aber schon fruher in seiner ursprunglichen Gestalt von Syrien und Kappadozien aus in Armenien ein. Anfangs hat es ais Einsiedierieben erschienen, das sich die strenge Askese charakterisiert hat.
15
63%
Vox Patrum
|
2001
|
vol. 40
83-85
EN
Nur paar Mai kommt der Name Ararat im hebraischen AT vor Er entspricht dem assyrischen Urartu, womit ursprtinglich das Land um See Van und nachtraglich das dort enstandene Reich benannt wurden. Der Name Armenien dagegen erscheint allein im griechischen Text von Jes 37, 38 (LXX). Der Artikel bespricht die obengenannten biblischen Stellen und versucht einen Uberblick tiber den heutigen Stand der Forschungen auf dem Berg Ararat und dereń Ergebnisse zu geben.
EN
translation
PL
tłumaczenie
PL
Niniejszy artykuł ma odpowiedzieć nie tylko na pytanie, jak wyglądała reakcja państw Kaukazu Południowego na agresję Rosji na Ukrainę, ale też wskazać, jak obecnie kształtują się stosunki międzynarodowe na obszarze Kaukazu Południowego oraz jakie są główne cele polityk zagranicznych Armenii, Azerbejdżanu oraz Gruzji. Na potrzeby artykułu stworzona została hipoteza badawcza, zakładająca, że obecnie żadne z państw Kaukazu Południowego nie jest już realnym sojusznikiem Stanów Zjednoczonych oraz Unii Europejskiej na Kaukazie Południowym, ponieważ po agresji Federacji Rosyjskiej na Ukrainę, ani Armenia, ani Azerbejdżan, ani Gruzja nie zdecydowały się na podjęcie działań, które wprost uderzałyby w interesy rosyjskie i które jednocześnie byłyby zbieżne z polityką Zachodu. Dokonując weryfikacji hipotezy badawczej, która została postawiona we Wstępie niniejszego tekstu, należy stwierdzić, że jest ona prawdziwa. Patrząc na działania wszystkich trzech państw z obszaru Kaukazu Południowego trudno dostrzec, aby któreś z nich otwarcie poparło na płaszczyźnie politycznej i militarnej Ukrainę. Żadne z nich nie dołączyło również do sankcji nakładanych przez Zachód na agresora. W artykule posłużono się głównie metodą decyzyjną, komparatystyczną oraz jedną z metod ogólnologicznych, czyli analizą.
EN
This article not only seeks to answer the question of how the South Caucasus countries reacted to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, but also to outline how international relations in the South Caucasus are currently evolving and identify the main foreign policy objectives of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. A research hypothesis was developed for the purpose of this article, which assumes that none of the South Caucasus countries are currently viable allies of the United States and the European Union in the region anymore, because following the Russian Federation’s aggression against Ukraine, neither Armenia, Azerbaijan nor Georgia have decided to take measures that would strike directly at Russian interests and also align with Western policy. In verifying the research hypothesis that was put forward in the Introduction to this text, it should be concluded that it is true. Looking at the actions of all the three South Caucasus countries, none of them has openly supported Ukraine on the political or military level. Nor have any of them joined the sanctions imposed on the aggressor by the West. The article mainly uses the decision-making method, the comparative method and one of the general logical methods, namely analysis.
EN
The presence of the Kurds in Karabakh, the contemporary Armenian-Azerbaijani borderland, since the beginning of the 18th century was used by great powers in their geopolitical rivalry in the South Caucasus. In the beginning of the 20th century, the Kurdish minority in Karabakh became part of the conflict between Armenian and Azeri nationalists as well as an element in the Soviet policy on nationalities. As a result, the Kurds got an autonomous county within Soviet Azerbaijan. They were indirectly supported by Armenians against the Azeris and finally assimilated by the Azerbaijani majority. The article is a short overview of the history of the Kurds in Karabakh and contains an analysis of their role in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. The paper maintains that both Armenians and the Azeris used the Kurds for their own political goals.
first rewind previous Page / 5 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.