Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Filozofia (Philosophy)

Authors help

  1. 2 Chabada M.

Years help

  1. 1 2018

  2. 1 2011

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  BOETHIUS OF DACIA
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

BOETHIUS Z DÁCIE, JEHO PROJEKT BLAŽENÉHO ŽIVOTA V DIELE O NAJVYŠŠOM DOBRE A ODSÚDENIA Z ROKU 1277

100%
Chabada M.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2011
|
vol. 66
|
issue 1
1-10
EN
Boethius's short treatise On the Highest Good represents one of the remarkable and important variants of ethical aristotelianism, enriched in Boethius by neo-platonic and augustinian themes. The idea of the 'philosophical way', which exclusively can lead to blissfulness, encompassing theory as well as practice, was dismissed by theologians - counsellors of Bishop Tempier. The result was an edict published in 1277, which among others condemned the ideas articulated in the treatise On the Highest Good. On closer view it appears, however, that the 'philosophical way' does not contradict the Christian way. Contrary to Thomas Aquinas or Bonaventura Boethius as a 'professional philosopher' did not manage to include philosophy into the theology. However, this is not to conceive the two contradicting disciplines, but rather as two different perspectives on one and the same thing. Therefore they can not be in conflict.
2

PROBLÉM VZŤAHU ROZUMU / FILOZOFIE A VIERY / NÁBOŽENSTVA V STREDOVEKEJ FILOZOFII (AVERROES, BOETHIUS Z DÁCIE A TOMÁŠ AKVINSKÝ) A PARALELY SO SÚČASNÝMI PRÍSTUPMI

100%
Chabada M.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2018
|
vol. 73
|
issue 4
282 – 293
EN
The paper deals with the relationship between reason/philosophy and faith/religion with some medieval authors (Averroes, Boethius of Dacia and Thomas Aquinas). Its first objective is to emphasize the key approaches such as the subordination of philosophy to religion or vice versa, which is based on the difference between the “absolute and relative” aspects. Its second objective is to identify the parallels and differences between the medieval and current strategies of addressing this issue (forms of conflict, independence, dialogue and integration). The author's opinion is that the relationship between reason/philosophy and faith/religion is primary methodological. The conflict between reason/philosophy and faith/religion is the result of a broad generalization of one of the two terms. The best form of the coexistence of science and religion is their mutual independence in those cases where we do not feel competent in any other than our own scientific discipline, or some form of a dialogue/integration (if we do have the necessary expertise).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.