Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  BRZOZOWSKI STANISLAW
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the article published in 'Droga' magazine in 1928, Stanislaw Brzozowski argued that Przybyszewski's book 'Zur Psychologie des Individuums' is the key to understanding his aesthetics and literary works. In his novels and plays, Przybyszewski showed the world in which 'we don't believe in truth anymore' and 'nothing is certain, everything is possible'. Besides, Przybyszewski himself was an oversensitive individual, as described in 'Zur Psychologie des Individuums'. Brzozowski emphasized that both criticism and admiration Przybyszewski met in Poland resulted from misunderstanding or incompetence. The article 'O Stanislawie Przybyszewskim' was intended as a short book. It was written probably in 1902 or at the beginning of 1903.
EN
Stanislaw Brzozowski considered Stanislaw Przybyszewski to be an important philosopher who was aware of the crisis European culture reached at the turn of the 19th and 20th century. Brzozowski wanted to create a new cultural consciousness, to see humanity as the active power and not the victim of biological or historical circumstances. In 1902, he begun to develop his own philosophy, taking Przybyszewski (and also Nietzsche and Avenarius) as a starting point. However, Brzozowski eventually realised that there is a fundamental philosophical disagreement between his project and Przybyszewski's views. The article confronts Przybyszewski's philosophy with its changing interpretation in Brzozowski.
EN
The focus in 'Brzozowski's Nietzsche. A Reconnaissance' is the presentation of the relationships between philosophical-critical papers by Stanislaw Brzozowski and Friedrich Nietzsche's intellectual potential. For the Polish critic, the philosophy of the author of 'Unfashionable Observations' becomes the problem of philosophical and aesthetic awareness whose influence voices on the level of ideology and style throughout his entire writings, though in an evolving manner. The text is not a systematic analysis of the relationships between the texts of the two philosophers in question; rather Nietzsche's texts were treated selectively and synchronically and associations with Brzozowski seen here are of various kinds (from acceptance through keeping a distance to negation). Their power, which is of crucial importance, is proved by the degree of appropriation, interiorisation and reading of Nietzschean investigations in the perspective of Brzozowski's own interests and reflections.
EN
The article refers to ethical aspects of forming writers' roles amidst their ruffled relationship with the Polish community (accusations of treason and departure from the country in the case of Stanislaw Brzozowski and emigration and giving up creation in his native language in the case of Joseph Conrad), a process that results in a conviction that both being and not being a Polish writer is very difficult. The autobiographical texts of both authors confirm that their ideas of literary tasks focus on a few notions: offence, blemish, shame, and oppression. Brzozowski and Conrad's choices depend on the negative influence of ethical rules that mark out a XIX century writer's range of duties. Therefore, the writers' views of their intellectual activity result from the 'ethics of exclusion'.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.