Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 9

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Bonaventure
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Řád lásky podle Bonaventury

100%
Machula T.
Studia theologica
|
2018
|
vol. 1
91-104
EN
One of the important questions concerning the theological virtue of charity is the order of charity. It is a simple problem of the succession in the expression of charity in relation to various people. It is obvious that we are obliged to love all people, but they have a different grade of perfection and dignity. It is also impossible to express our charity to all people in the same way and in the same intensity, because our time, strengths and means are limited. This is why the question of order in our expression of charity is so important. The beginning of our considerations on the order of charity deal with the celebrated verse from Gal 6:10, which explicitly provides a preference to people of the same religion. The idea of the order of charity was a standard part of various commentaries and tracts on the theological virtue of charity of the first Christian centuries. This paper is focused on a commentary on this question in the writings of a very important representative of High Medieval Scholasticism St. Bonaventure. His concept is continuously compared with some other important authors of this era, the Dominicans Albert the Great, Thomas Aquinas and the Franciscan John Duns Scotus.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gilson’s Notion of Theologism in The Unity of Philosophical Experience and Reason and Revelation in the Middle Ages

84%
Capehart J. D.
Studia Gilsoniana
|
2019
|
vol. 8
|
issue 1
11-44
EN
The author examines Gilson’s development of the term “theologism” from his 1937 The Unity of Philosophical Experience and his 1938 Reason and Revelation in the Middle Ages. This term is important for understanding Gilson’s developing doctrine on Christian philosophy. The treatment of it helps to show how Gilson’s understanding of Christian philosophy does not entail the formal conflation of philosophy with Christianity—as some have accused. In fact, the knowledge of what theologism is—referring primarily to the misuse of philosophy by the theologian—helps to set the stage for seeking an understanding of the proper relationship of Christianity to philosophy, a unity which maintains formal distinction. This knowledge also provides a hermeneutical tool for the proper interpretation of Gilson’s later writings on Christian philosophy.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Przełom w teologii św. Bonawentury z Bagnoregio i jego teologiczno-pastoralne konsekwencje w perspektywie współczesności

84%
Woźniak R. J.
Polonia Sacra
|
2019
|
vol. 23
|
issue 2(56)
61-82
PL
Artykuł opiera się na przekonaniu o znaczącym zwrocie, który nastąpił w myśli Bonawentury około roku 1259. Istotą przełomu w La Verna była radykalizacja egzystencjalnego wątku teologii Doktora Serafickiego. Niniejszy artykuł jest próbą opisania podstawowych teologicznych i duszpasterskich konsekwencji tego zwrotu w stosunku do współczesności. Głównym punktem odniesienia jest tekst Itinerarium mentis in Deum.
EN
The article is based on the conviction of a significant modification that occurred in Bonaventure’s thought around 1259. The essence of the breakthrough in La Verna was the radicalization of the existential thread of theology of the doctor Seraphicus. This paper is an attempt to describe the basic theological and pastoral consequences of this turn in their relation to the present day. The main point of attention is text of Itinerarium mentis in Deum.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

La fiducia nella Provvidenza. Commentario di san Bonaventura a Lc 12,13-34

84%
Estrada B.
Teologia w Polsce
|
2015
|
vol. 9
|
issue 1
5-16
EN
In his exegetic study on Luke 12, Seraphic Doctor performs a detailed analysis of the content and defines the two main parts of 12: 13-34. His exegesis of the sections is consistent with the meaning of the text, and his hermeneutic remarks are noteworthy from theological, philosophical and practical points of view. Following the method used already at the time of Saint Augustine and confirmed by Victorinus’ philosophy, his analyses often offer quotations combined in a way that strengthens the analysis with the use od biblical texts of analogous content. Reading a text by such a great theologian as Bonaventure, one can only admire his thoroughness, logical reasoning, conclusions and pieces of advice he provides. Encounters with his interpretations are always an enlightening experience.
PL
Nel lavoro esegetico attorno a Lc 12 il Dottore Serafi co fa un’analisi dettagliata del contenuto e determina le due parti fondamentali di 12,1-34. La sua esegesi dei singoli passi è in concordanza con il senso del testo, e le sue osservazioni ermeneutiche, dal punto di vista teologico, filosofico e pratico, sono apprezzabili. Seguendo un metodo collaudato già dai tempi di Agostino, che poi si affermò nella scuola dei Vittorini, è frequente vedere nella sua interpretazione delle citazioni incrociate, in modo da rinforzare il ragionamento mediante testi biblici con un contenuto analogo. Quando si prende fra le mani un testo di un grande teologo come Bonaventura, non si può non ammirare la sua acutezza, il ragionamento logicamente svolto, le conclusioni e i consigli che ne ricava. Il contatto con la sua interpretazione è sempre illuminante.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kim był Bonawentura Pleciuch, autor wiersza Prośba do Aniołów Stróżów, aby nas zachowali od gotycyzmu (1822)?

67%
Pluta P.
Tematy i Konteksty
|
2021
|
vol. 16
|
issue 11
390-399
EN
The purpose of this paper is an attempt to determine the authorship of a poem entitled “A Plea to Guardian Angels to save us from gothicism” published in 1822 under the pseudonym of Bonawentura Pleciuch. In my analysis I propose a hypothesis that the poem’s satirical tone and the place of its publication, local periodical Krakus, allow us to link it with the name of Konstanty Majeranowski. I discuss Majeranowski’s literary activity, paying special attention to his feature columns entitled A Philospohical Scrap, all of which in high probability suggests his authorship of “A Plea to Guardian Angels…”.
PL
Przedmiotem artykułu jest próba ustalenia autorstwa opublikowanego w 1822 roku pod pseudonimem Bonawentura Pleciuch wiersza Prośba do Aniołów Stróżów, aby nas zachowali od gotycyzmu. Przeprowadzona w rozprawie interpretacja utworu zwraca uwagę na jego satyryczny charakter, natomiast miejsce publikacji wiersza – czasopismo „Krakus” – pozwala łączyć utwór z Konstantym Majeranowskim. Omówienie działalności pisarskiej Majeranowskiego, a zwłaszcza jego felietonów ukazujących się pod tytułem Świstek Filozoficzny pozwala z dużym prawdopodobieństwem stwierdzić, że autorem Prośby do Aniołów Stróżów… był właśnie Konstanty Majeranowski.
6
Content available remote

La fiducia nella Provvidenza. Commentario di san Bonaventura a Lc 12,13-34

67%
Estrada B.
Teologia w Polsce
|
2015
|
vol. 9
|
issue 1
5-16
IT
Nel lavoro esegetico attorno a Lc 12 il Dottore Serafico fa un’analisi dettagliata del contenuto e determina le due parti fondamentali di 12,1-34. La sua esegesi dei singoli passi è in concordanza con il senso del testo, e le sue osservazioni ermeneutiche, dal punto di vista teologico, filosofico e pratico, sono apprezzabili. Seguendo un metodo collaudato già dai tempi di Agostino, che poi si affermò nella scuola dei Vittorini, è frequente vedere nella sua interpretazione delle citazioni incrociate, in modo da rinforzare il ragionamento mediante testi biblici con un contenuto analogo. Quando si prende fra le mani un testo di un grande teologo come Bonaventura, non si può non ammirare la sua acutezza, il ragionamento logicamente svolto, le conclusioni e i consigli che ne ricava. Il contatto con la sua interpretazione è sempre illuminante.
PL
W pracy egzegetycznej dotyczącej Łk 12 Doktor Seraficki dokonuje szczegółowej analizy treści i określa dwie części zasadnicze 12,13-34. Jego egzegeza poszczególnych passusów jest zgodna ze znaczeniem tekstu, a jego uwagi hermeneutyczne – z teologicz- nego, filozoficznego i praktycznego punktu widzenia – są godne uwagi. Śledząc metodę sprawdzoną już od czasów Augustyna, która potem utwierdziła się w szkole wiktorynów, w jego interpretacji często widać cytaty skrzyżowane w taki sposób, że wzmacniają one analizowanie za pomocą tekstów biblijnych o analogicznej treści. Kiedy bierze się do rąk tekst tak wielkiego teologa, jakim jest Bonawentura, można jedynie podziwiać jego wnikliwość, logicznie prowadzone rozumowanie, wnioski i rady, jakie z nich wyprowa-dza. Kontakt z jego interpretacją jest zawsze oświecający.
EN
In his exegetic study on Luke 12, Seraphic Doctor performs a detailed analysis of the content and defines the two main parts of 12: 13-34. His exegesis of the sections is consistent with the meaning of the text, and his hermeneutic remarks are noteworthy from theological, philosophical and practical points of view. Following the method used already at the time of Saint Augustine and confirmed by Victorinus’ philosophy, his analyses often offer quotations combined in a way that strengthens the analysis with the use od biblical texts of analogous content. Reading a text by such a great theologian as Bonaventure, one can only admire his thoroughness, logical reasoning, conclusions and pieces of advice he provides. Encounters with his interpretations are always an enlightening experience.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Philosophie des Mittelalters: Eine Einführung by Hannes Möhle

67%
Welter B.
Studia Gilsoniana
|
2020
|
vol. 9
|
issue 1
191-197
EN
This paper is a review of the book: Hannes Möhle, Philosophie des Mittelalters: Eine Einführung (Berlin: Springer, 2019). The author highlights that Möhle’s book (1) examines a range of key medieval philosophical issues, and illustrates how philosophy stood separately from theology even while heavily influenced by Church and theological matters, and (2) provides readers with a better grounding in many of the longstanding or urgent concerns of medieval philosophy from the perspective of some of the era’s central thinkers.
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Czy przedmiotem radości może być coś innego niż Bóg? Augustyn, Piotr Lombard, Bonawentura o "usus" i "fruitio"

59%
Płotka M.
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
|
2019
|
vol. 55
|
issue 3
5-32
EN
This article discusses the historical development of the concept of joy in medieval philosophy and theology. It focuses on the problem of the relation between “usus” and “fruitio”. The former concept (“use”) connotes the whole spectrum of possible attitudes of man in his relation to temporal goods. The use of temporal goods by man is an earthly, temporal, and secular experience. It can take a sinful form – sensual pleasures – or a religious form, in which case it becomes a foretaste of eternal happiness. The second concept (fruitio) means happiness, and it is the fulfillment of the sum total of all human desires. Fruitio only occurs after death, and it is an element of beatifica visio. Usus concerns changeable, temporal goods, while the only object of fruitio is God. This article is devoted to the question of whether the object of fruitio can be anything other than God, i.e. whether the temporal good can be the object of full joy, and if so, how. An answer to this question would require an analysis of a number of specific issues: what conditions (subjective, objective) would have to be met in order for the use of the temporal good to qualify for joy? How does the moral evaluation of the use of such goods proceed? What are the emotional components of usus? In other words, the central problem of this article is the concept of usus (the use of temporal goods) and the medieval interpretations of this concept as a connotating human experience of temporal (incomplete) joy caused by earthly goods. Mainly, the article concentrates on three authors: Augustine, Peter Lombard and Bonaventure, and presents three different theories of joy: joy as a possession of the desired object (Augustine), joy as longing for a desired object (Peter Lombard) and joy as distance to the desired object (Bonaventure). Lastly, the article argues that the development of the concept of joy in the period between 395 BC and the second half of the thirteenth century is the history of an ever greater appreciation of joy and the perception of its proper meaning in human life.
PL
Artykuł omawia historyczny rozwój koncepcji radości w filozofii i teologii średniowiecznej. Koncentruje się na trzech autorach: Augustynie, Piotrze Lombardzie i Bonawenturze, i przedstawia kolejne trzy teorie radości: radość jako posiadanie pożądanego przedmiotu (Augustyn), radość jako oczekiwanie na pożądany przedmiot (Piotr Lombard) oraz radość jako dystans w stosunku do pożądanego przedmiotu (Bonawentura). Wreszcie, artykuł argumentuje, że dzieje radości w okresie 395–druga połowa XIII wieku to dzieje coraz większego docenienia radości i dostrzeżenia jej właściwego znaczenia w życiu człowieka.
9
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Revelation as the Thou of Jesus Christ Joseph Ratzinger’s/Pope Benedict XVI’s Contribution to a deeper Understanding of Revelation

48%
de Gaál E.
Poznańskie Studia Teologiczne
|
2016
|
issue 30
7-55
EN
The article discusses Pope Benedict XVI’s / Joseph Ratzinger’s understanding of revelation. It shows the bases for his understanding to be found in the theology of St. Bonaventure, more specifically in the Doctor Seraphicus’ Hexaëmeron. It is on the theology of history in Bonaventure that Ratzinger had written his terminal paper. This will allow him to impact Vatican II in an original way. The essay describes how the young peritus Joseph Ratzinger contributed in a most decisive way to the dogmatic constitution on divine revelation Dei Verbum’s recalibration of the nature of revelation. It also discusses hope Pope Benedict‘s teaching office thematized revelation. Revelation is ultimately neither Scripture nor tradition, but the self-disclosure of the Triune God in the Thou of Jesus Christ.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.