Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article comprises a discussion on the supervision of the activity of museums established by central administration bodies and local self-government bodies. Museums, as a result of the public administration decentralisation, have been equipped with substantial independence from the entities that establish them. Appropriate protection of the assets they are entrusted with, and the fulfilment of the objectives set for museums, call for appropriate supervision of the tasks they have been assigned. The present model is inefficient so it calls for an intervention of the legislator. First of all, it is necessary to adjust the scope of competence of individual supervision bodies, and the resources they have at their disposal, to the scope and nature of the tasks they have been entrusted with. It is especially important to introduce effective supervision of the protection of the collections, because it is the most important task of museums.
EN
The Court of Audit of France was established by Napoleon in 1807 to meet the needs of the emperor and his ministers. Cooperation of the Court of Audit with the Parliament was not provided for at the time. Over the last two centuries, the Court’s tasks have evolved, as well the ways in which they are performed. At present, the Court of Audit of France is the supreme audit body that carries out financial and performance audits of, among others, the central administration, public enterprises and state assets. Simultaneously, the Court acts as a specialised administrative court. At the beginning of 1990s, the mandate of the Court was extended to cover new areas and entities, and new audit types were introduced. Some of those transformations were related to the new attitude adopted by the Court that has become more and more concerned with the expectations of the Parliament and the public opinion.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.