Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  CIVIL CONTENTIOUS CODE
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article deals with the specific problems stemming from logical inconsistency of legislation regularisation of the elimination of the defects in case of applications for urgent measures. At the first glance, without further interpretation, it seems so called logical inconsistency of normative text of Civil Contentious Code´s provisions norming either general conditions of any submission addressed to the court and either especially in case of submission of the application for the urgent measure. The author after the raise of the problem exploring of the possibility of the interpretative removing of the glance logically contradictory legal regimes of Articles 128, § 129 and § 327 of the Civil Contentious Code. Interpretive meta principle lex specialis derogat legi generali matures to postulate of different legal regimes of applications for urgent measures in the main proceedings, and those who are not administering proceedings. The conclusion and author´s advised wording of so called operative, concretely applicable norm underlines rational interpretation of legal text, in conformity with the parole contained in literary works, e.g. Exupery´s Little Prince, and in in literature of fact by plenty of authors in law branch and also in general methodology of the science.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.