Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  COURT DECISIONS
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

ARGUMENT ĽUDSKEJ DÔSTOJNOSTI V ODÔVODNENÍ SÚDNYCH ROZHODNUTÍ

100%
Kuklová K.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2020
|
vol. 103
|
issue 1
3 – 12
EN
The text critically reflects the use of human dignity in the reasoning of court decisions. The author concludes that an increase in the tendency to include everything in dignity as an objective value may lead to the notion of a moral order of society, which in fact leads to a restriction of the subjective freedom of each individual.
2
Content available remote

Skarga na bezczynność i przewlekłe prowadzenie postępowania – zakres sądowej kontroli

88%
Daniel P.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2013
|
vol. 58
|
issue 3 (350)
90-104
EN
The article discusses the criteria for adjudicating in cases related to the idleness of an administration body or lengthy proceedings, with reference to the judicature of administrative courts. The article shows that, in the present legal status, court decisions are not limited to controlling the dates of administrative arrangements, but they also refer to the assessment of the justifiability of activities undertaken by the public administration.
3

KONFLIKT SLOBODY PREJAVU A OCHRANY OSOBNOSTNÝCH PRÁV OSÔB VEREJNÉHO ZÁUJMU V ROZHODOVACEJ PRAXI SÚDOV

63%
Zlocha Ľ.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2016
|
vol. 99
|
issue 1
12 – 28
EN
Freedom of expression is protected by Article 10 of the European convention of human rights and also by Article 26 of the Constitution of Slovak Republic. The Constitution, as well as the Convention, sets limits upon which freedom of expression can be restricted. However, journalists and mass media have a privileged position from these restrictions, especially when reporting matters of public interest. Journalists have a social obligation to provide information and ideas on all matters of public interest and the public is entitled to receive such information. Journalists are even allowed to use some degree of exaggeration and provocation. In Slovakia we can observe that public persons, for example politicians or judges, take action against the media for alleged damage to their reputation and honour by publication of false information, unreasonable criticism or even the publication of their cartoons. Slovakian courts often decide in favour of public figures and media have to pay these persons high financial compensations. In this article the author examines approach of Slovakian courts in comparison with decisions of Constitutional court of Slovak Republic, Czech Republic and the European court of human rights.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.