Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  CRITICAL PHILOSOPHY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

THE IMMEDIATE COGNITION PROBLEM IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES, KANT, AND FRIES

100%
Jacyk D.
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
|
2009
|
issue 15(28)
105-119
EN
The philosophical turn towards the subject made by Descartes initiated a large and multi-branch current of the philosophy of the subject. The followers of Descartes' method described their projects from the perspective of a reflective paradigm of philosophizing. The research into human reflectiveness and the phenomenon of self-cognition from the critical perspective of transcendentalism led Jacob F. Fries to present his philosophy in a new way of argumentation, which is described in the author's essay.
2

Problem istnienia przestrzeni. Polemika B. Stattlera z koncepcją I. Kanta

86%
Skowron A.
Kwartalnik Filozoficzny
|
2017
|
vol. 45
|
issue 4
83-97
EN
This article analyzes the polemic about the definition of space between Immanuel Kant's conception and the conception of the German Enlightement thinker Benedict Stattler. Stattler’s critique is important to consider, as he spent many years of his life analyzing Kant's writings and published eleven polemical works, including a special one entitled "Anti-Kant". Stattler is also a forgotten philosopher, who shared the fate of many of his contemporaries who also did not easily fit in with the scientific situation of their time, and who, nonetheless, left behind many interesting conceptions.
3

Mimesis, cezura i spekulacja w filozofii T.W. Adorna i P Lacoue- Labarthe`a

86%
Górski J.
Kwartalnik Filozoficzny
|
2017
|
vol. 45
|
issue 4
135-167
EN
The aim of this essay is a better understanding of two crucial 20th century conceptions of mimesis. A comparative analysis will be conducted of, on the one hand, Adorno’s theory of mimesis-construction (Ratio) interrelations in the context of the philosophical and political determinants of 20th century art “after” Auschwitz, and, on the other, of Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe’s critical interpretation of the aforementioned theory. In his aesthetic theory, with its framework of negative dialectics, Adorno uses the idea of mimesis-construction to define and to describe the very profound, fundamental relation between art philosophy and politics, whereas Lacoue-Labarthe – a French poststructuralist from the second half of 20th century – is focusing on the deconstruction of such interplay in the name of the autonomy of art. The common ground for this comparison is provided by Friedrich Hölderlin’s early poetry and his theory of modern tragedy, as well as Walter Benjamin’s idea of das Gedichtete and Martin Heidegger’s thesis on the role of poetry and the figure of the poet. In short, this essay will aim to present Adorno’s theory as worded in his Parataxis in the light of the critique from Lacoue-Labarthe’s essay titled Il faut.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.