Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Cittaslow network
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
The purpose of this article has been to present the history of the Polish National Cittaslow Network, to discuss its development and to draw the attention to the diversity of network member cities. The authors emphasise the fact that the Polish National Cittaslow Network is developing very dynamically, and is the second largest network of Cittaslow in the world. Today, it is composed of 28 cities, of which 20 lie in the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship. Other two centers are currently in the process of joining the network. The member cities are diverse in terms of their size as well as environmental or cultural assets. They are also diverse in terms of the level of socio-economic development. There are such cities in the network whose level of entrepreneurship, measured by the number of private sector businesses per 1,000 residents, is much higher than the average for the whole network (Rzgów, Murowana Goślina), but there are also cities with a very low level of entrepreneurship (Rejowiec Fabryczny, Jeziorany). Despite the differences, the cities associated in the network share the same concept and pursue shared aims in order to improve the quality of life for their inhabitants. They are proponents of implementing pro-social and pro-environmental measures, while striving to preserve the unique character of each of these cities.
EN
The aim of this article is to present a network model of a revitalization of small towns unique in Poland and even in Europe . Fourteen small towns in the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodship, thanks to their membership in the Cittaslow City network and the establishment of the Polish Cittaslow Association, received significant funds for their development under the Supralocal Revitalization Program of the Network of Cittaslow Cities for 2014–2020. This program is based on a hybrid model of urban development, which was created from the overlap of financial models (ERDF, ESF funds, own funds) and the so-called “social” revitalization model on developing in Poland Cittaslow model oriented to a good quality of life. This is an example of the efficient use by the network of cooperating cities of economies of scale in competing with other urban centers for development measures. Thanks to the unified diagnosis of existing problems in the physical, economic and social space of these cities (delimitation areas, delimitation indicators: unemployment rate and share of people using social assistance in the area revitalized in relation to the entire city), differentiated urban activities were undertaken in integrated financial projects that concerned the restriction of various social dysfunctions, including the problem of unemployment.
PL
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie unikalnego w Polsce, a nawet w Europie, sieciowego modelu rewitalizacji małych miast. Czternaście małych miast w regionie warmińsko-mazurskim, dzięki przynależności do sieci Miast Cittaslow oraz powołaniu Stowarzyszenia Polskich Miast Cittaslow, uzyskało znaczące dla ich rozwoju fundusze w ramach Ponadlokalnego Programu Rewitalizacji Miast Sieci Cittaslow na lata 2014–2020. Program ten opiera się na hybrydowym modelu rozwoju miast, który powstał z nałożenia się modeli: finansowego (fundusze EFRR, EFS, własne fundusze) i modelu tzw. „społecznej” rewitalizacji na rozwijający się w Polsce model miast Citatslow, zorientowanych na dobrą jakość życia. Jest to przykład efektywnego wykorzystania przez sieć współpracujących ze sobą miast efektu skali w konkurowaniu z innymi ośrodkami miejskimi o środki rozwojowe. Dzięki ujednoliconej diagnozie istniejących problemów w przestrzeni fizycznej, gospodarczej i społecznej tych miast (obszary delimitacji, wskaźniki delimitacji: stopień bezrobocia oraz udział ludności korzystającej z pomocy społecznej na terenie rewitalizowanym w odniesieniu do całości terytorium miasta) w zintegrowanych przedsięwzięciach inwestycyjnych podjęto zróżnicowane w skali miast działania dotyczące ograniczenia różnych dysfunkcji społecznych, w tym problemu bezrobocia.
EN
International cooperation between cities is conducted in numerous spheres, including economic, social, and cultural. It is determined by various factors such as the similarities and previous interrelations between cities, a desire to exchange good practices for management and quality of life improvement and by economic conditions. An example of international cooperation between cities is the Cittaslow network. The aim of this article is to present the concept of international cooperation between cities based on the example of the cities of the Cittaslow network and to identify the determinants and benefits of such cooperation. The Cittaslow network is an affiliation of over 230 cities from all over the world. The reason for their cooperation is the similarities between them, in this case, with respect to their size and the development model they have adopted. Within the Cittaslow network, cooperation takes place between small cities which want to grow in accordance with the “slow” movement principles and make such cooperation very advantageous for the following spheres: environmental, social, economic and spatial.
EN
The main purpose of the work is to describe and evaluate the implementation of the slow city concept in small cities, located in the zones of influence of large cities. The research subjects are two cities, Murowana Goślina in the Poznań agglomeration (Poland) and Schneverdingen in the metropolitan area of Hamburg (Germany). The local resources of both cities were analyzed, such as: values of the natural environment, cultural heritage, economic functions, social and tourist infrastructure as well as urban policies related to obtaining a certificate of membership in an international organization such as the Cittaslow network. A number of similarities have been found for the abovementioned resources, while using them differently as factors for local development. Based on the results of social research (interviews with representatives of local authorities and a survey among residents), it was shown that in the process of implementing the slow city idea, elements of social capital, including the knowledge and determination of local authorities, as well as the awareness and commitment of residents play a key role.
PL
Głównym celem pracy jest opis i ocena wdrażania koncepcji slow city w małych miastach, położonych w strefach oddziaływania dużych miast. Podmiotem badań są dwa miasta: Murowana Goślina w aglomeracji poznańskiej (Polska) i Schneverdingen w obszarze metropolitalnym Hamburga (Niemcy). Analizie poddano zasoby lokalne obu miast, takie jak: walory środowiska przyrodniczego, dziedzictwo kulturowe, funkcje gospodarcze, infrastruktura społeczna i turystyczna oraz polityki miejskie związane z uzyskaniem certyfikatu członkostwa w organizacji międzynarodowej, jaką jest sieć Cittaslow. Stwierdzono szereg podobieństw wymienionych zasobów przy jednoczesnym ich różnym wykorzystaniu jako czynników rozwoju lokalnego. Na podstawie wyników badań społecznych (wywiady z przedstawicielami władz lokalnych i ankieta wśród mieszkańców) wykazano, że w procesie wdrażania idei slow city kluczową rolę odgrywają elementy kapitału społecznego, w tym wiedza i determinacja władz lokalnych oraz świadomość i zaangażowanie mieszkańców.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.