Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Conferences
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Forum Philosophicum
|
2010
|
vol. 15
|
issue 1
242-249
EN
The article focuses on the report of the International Workshop on “17th Century Polish Jesuits in China: Michal Boym, Jan Mikolaj Smogulecki, and Andrzej Rudomina” held at the University School of Philosophy and Education in Poland organized by the Monumenta Serica Institute (Sinological Institute for Chinese Studies). The author focuses on the Chinese philosophy lecture by Professor Shi Yunli about the influence of Smogulecki on Xue Fengzou, Chinese culture and science and their work on astrology and astronomy.
EN
Finding a niche journal for the submission of an academic paper can sometimes be a challenge for authors, and finding the right choice may involve a series of submissions and rejections. Emails from editors and journals related to the submission or rejection of a paper should be strictly related to these purposes, i.e., to inform authors that their paper has been received, outline the subsequent editorial handling or peer reviewer steps in the former, or the reasons for rejection in the latter. This paper highlights four cases of - in the author’s opinion - the abuse of such emails by COPE member journals and publishers (Emerald Publishing Ltd., Springer Nature, Elsevier, Wiley) to advertise for-profit English revision and editing services and/or conferences, as a way to maximize these emails for a dual purpose, namely to inform authors of submission-related aspects (valid communication) while also trying to obtain clients and thus business for non-submission-related aspects (invalid communication). Since an abuse of email-based communication for non-academic purposes is an ethics-related matter, there is a need for systematic research of this potential abuse of emails from both COPE member and non-member journals.
EN
Academic conferences are platforms established by scientists to provide broad access to their research. For this reason, it is important to have influential researchers presenting plenary talks and for the scientific community in that field to submit their work. Various organizations and academic institutions organize hundreds of academic conferences a year. Academics have to select conferences to attend, since it is not possible to participate in every conference. Conference selection takes into account such factors as: the registration fee, subject of the conference and its appropriateness, conference language and the deadline for submission. We consider the specific criteria that academics use to choose conferences and effective decision-making in this field. In this study, we use an approach based on analytic network processes (ANPs) to appropriately choose a conference based on multiple criteria.
PL
Potrzeba stworzenia uznanej definicji podmiotowości (osobowości) międzynarodowej, zwłaszcza takiej, która pozwalałaby na odróżnianie od podmiotów innych niż państwa struktur niepodmiotowych, dotyczy też organizacji i konferencji międzynarodowych (międzyrządowych) sensu largo. Problem tych konferencji bywa poruszany w doktrynie rzadko. Niektóre z nich, zwłaszcza GATT i OBWE, korzystały lub korzystają z niewątpliwej podmiotowości międzynarodowej. Istnieją konferencje wewnątrz organizacji, jak np. unijna IGC, prawotwórcze (np. Rzymska nt. Statutu MTK) i „wewnątrz” traktatów (np. COP w Ramowej Konwencji NZ NT zmian klimatu). Na drugim biegunie są konferencje o minimalnych cechach podmiotowych. Konferencje odgrywają coraz większą rolę w obrocie międzynarodowym. Wszystko to uzasadnia stawiane tu pytania oraz propozycję zarysu badań nad systematyką, prawem, zasadami i procedurami konferencji międzynarodowych. Problem statusu konferencji jest tu chyba najistotniejszy.
EN
The necessity to create a widely recognized definition of international personality (especially such that would provide possibility to distinguish subjects from non-subject structures) refers also to international (intergovernmental) organizations and conferences. The problem of the conferences is seldom touched in the doctrine. Some of conferences, especially GATT and CSCE/OSCE used or use undoubtible international subjectivity (and effectivity). On the other end there are conferences with minimal subject features. In classification aspects, there are authonome conferences, conferences inside organizations (GOs) like e.g. IGC of the EU, lawmaking conferences (like Rome Conference on the ICC Statute), or “inside” an international treaty (e.g. COPs & MOPs in the UN Framework Convention of the Climate Changes - UNFCCC). International Organisations and Conferences play a big role in the international legal turn-over. That all justifies questions and proposal of researches on systematics, law and principles of the international conferences status.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.