Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  DENDROLOGY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPLEX DENDROLOGICAL METHODOLOGY (Istorychny rozvytok kompleksnoyi dendrolohichnoyi metodolohiyi)

100%
Ivchenko I. S.
Nauka ta naukoznavstvo (Science and Science of Science)
|
2009
|
issue 3
46-60
EN
According to historians of botany, history of botanic research in a natural or administrative region is linked to the history of research of its flora, and, accordingly, dendroflora. On the basis of this statement, several methods and approaches are proposed for comparative historical studies of the dendrological field. Specifics of dendrofloristics as a mainstream dendrology field are outlined by use of logical, regional, geographic, systemic, functional and other methods. Historically, dendrofloristics was based on research of populations of wooden plants. History of studies of wooden plants in the evolutionary epoch in the context of building up the complex dendrological methodology is analyzed. These studies are associated with the rise of phytocentric field in dendrology. Empirical and visual dendrofloristic methods of the past classification epoch were replaced by sounder approaches of the evolutionary epoch in the last third of XIX century. They are based on identification of population integrity of dendrological objects as elements of natural systems. At the same time, revival of ethnobotanic approaches poses question about integration of floristic and phytocenotic methods, and creation of separate dendrological methodology on the systemic basis.
2

SYSTEMIC APPROACH AND ITS ROLE IN THE HISTORY OF DENDROLOGY (Systemny pidkhid ta yoho rol' v istoriyi dendrolohiyi)

88%
Ivchenko I. S.
Nauka ta naukoznavstvo (Science and Science of Science)
|
2010
|
issue 1
40-55
EN
Historical account of dendrology development before and after reforms of K.Linnaeus is given, with emphasis on contributions of the Italian scientist A.Caesalpini (16th century), details concerning the periods of K.Linnaeus's establishing as a scientist, contributions of Ukrainian Mykhailo Grushevsky. While the role of dendrofloristics was prevailing in pre-evolutionary era, in the middle of 19th century dendrology became a complex discipline and required systemic approach and analysis. Systematization as a leading branch of botany acquired its contemporary scientific meaning during the evolutionary era of dendrology. In the subsequent period classification aspects predominated, subordinated to the principle of systematical and geographical paradigm of botanical science. Success of dendrology was more essential in applied and interdisciplinary aspects. Main components of the phenomenon of dendrology as botanical and forestry 'moulds' determined its optional character in 20th century, and a minor theoretical significance. Theory of systems in dendrology, systemic analysis of dendrology objects and use of systemic approach allows for integrating its leading fields on ethnobotanical and floristic basis.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.