Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  DERRIDA JACQUES
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

DERRIDA’S HOSPITALITY IN A NUTSHELL. AN INVITATION

100%
Belovai G.
Verba Theologica. Teologický časopis
|
2018
|
vol. 17
|
issue 1
57 – 69
EN
In this article the author introduces four ideas from the late works of the great French philosopher of the 20th centruy, Jacques Derrida that can be relevant when we discuss religion and religious topics. The author’s aim is to find common points, shared motifs that could lead to a major idea which rules Derrida’s late philosophy. This idea will be the absolute hospitality, the hospitality to come. Through Derrida’s texts we will see the significance of religious motifs (God, messianism, etc.) gathering around the problem of hospitality.
2

INSTITUTION WITH IMPOSSIBILITY. 'THE BOOK OF QUESTIONS', SURREALISM AND THE HOLOCAUST (Naznaczenie niemozliwoscia. 'Ksiega Pytan', surrealizm i Holokaust)

100%
Kula A.
Teksty Drugie (Second Texts)
|
2008
|
issue 6(114)
252-263
EN
Reception of 'The Book of Questions', a seven-volume poem by Edmond Jabes, has been primarily set by interpretations of Jacques Derrida and Maurice Blanchot. Is this right, in each case? Especially, in the reading by the author of Différance, a few questions seem worth clarifying or complementing. Questions appear about the unobvious autobiographism of 'The Book of Questions' and about what Jabes says on Holocaust and its place in the Jewish history; about the opposition between the language and the construction of the work; and, about surrealism as an important reference point in the poet's artistic itinerary.
3
Content available remote

Umění zrající svými přesahy

88%
Mathauser Z.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2006
|
vol. 54
|
issue 2-3
59-73
EN
This essay is focused on the phenomenological qualification not only - as demonstrated by Elmar Holenstein in particular - of linguistic aspects of the Prague School, but also its literary-studies aspects. One must also take into account the transcendental result of a given impulse, of the determining status of the opposite transcendental gestures of an artistic text. It is useful in this connection to imagine the shifts in the composition of the 'artistic situation', which arise from Mukarovsky's 1943 distinction between the work-thing and the work-sign.
4

DERRIDOVA KRITIKA HUSSERLOVY FILOSOFIE ZNAKU A JAZYKA

88%
Urban P.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2012
|
vol. 67
|
issue 1
47 – 60
EN
The paper aims to provide a close reading analysis of Derrida’s critique of Husserl’s approach to philosophy of sings and language. Its focus is on Derrida’s Speech and Phenomena and Form and Meaning, trying to disclose the main line of his argument against Husserl’s attempt to separate the indicative and expressive functions of language sings, as well as to think language as a non-productive medium of expressing the pre-linguistic sense.
5
Content available remote

THE ANIMAL WHICH I'AM DYING. HEIDEGGER, DERRIDA, AGAMBEN (Zwierze, które umieram. Heidegger, Derrida, Agamben

88%
Moscicki P.
|
2009
|
vol. 63
|
issue 4(287)
61-68
EN
This text tries to reconstruct a debate concerning the philosophical status of the relation between man and animal. The author outlined the conception proposed by Martin Heidegger and then cited its critical presentations by Jacques Derrida and Giorgio Agamben. Their deconstruction of the German philosopher's discourse comprises a radical attempt at severing links with the anthropocentric tradition of philosophy. The ultimate objective of the reflections pursued in the essay is, however, not yet another critique of metaphysics, but saving man from the desperate gesture of enrooting the specificity of his existence in a privileged relation with death. In this manner, man is supposed to not only come closer to others but also to distance himself from death.
6

DERRIDOVA „FILOPOLEMOLOGIE“

75%
Lambert G.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2017
|
vol. 72
|
issue 7
505 – 514
EN
The paper focuses on the fact that, in recent political philosophy, we have witnessed a critical overturning of an earlier philosophical idealism that invoked friendship as the destination of the political and, in its place, of what the author will call a non-philosophical understanding that has determined a certain war (pólemos), and the “friend-enemy” relation, as the permanent ground from which any critical or strategic understanding of the political must now depart. This tendency can most clearly be illustrated by Jacques Derrida’s commentaries on the German jurist Karl Schmitt and the German philosopher Martin Heidegger. In this article, the author will address Derrida’s overt polemic and/or Auseinandersetzung with these two thinkers in his later writings. First, she will discuss his polemic with Schmitt from The Politics of Friendship (1990), and will conclude with some preliminary remarks on the culmination of this polemic in his reflections on Heidegger from the same period.
7

SPRAVEDLNOST, DEKONSTRUKCE A DIFFERÄNCE: O BESTIALITĚ A STÁTU

75%
Charvát M.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2017
|
vol. 72
|
issue 7
527 – 536
EN
The main aim of the paper is to analyse the role of the concept of “beast” and its relationship to political philosophy as well as Derrida’s deconstructive reading of Western philosophical tradition. The problematic significance of the concept of “beast” enables Derrida to re-articulate the relationship between the state, law, and justice. Justice seems to be grasped in the deconstruction of binary opposition between the man and the animal/beast. This meets Derrida’s demand to establish an ethics of singularity, postulated in his late writings.
8

BINARY TROUBLE: PRECONDITIONS FOR NON-BINARY GENDER IN WORKS OF HEIDEGGER, DERRIDA AND BUTLER

75%
Prášil J.
Človek a spoločnosť. Internetový časopis pre pôvodné teoretické a výskumné štúdie z oblasti spoločenských vied
|
2018
|
vol. 21
|
issue 3
25 – 38
EN
Non-binary gender as an umbrella term refers to any gender beyond the male/female categories. With the progressing LGBT+ movement and future predictions referring to all persons equally „regardless of their chosen gender” (Cave, Klein, 2015), the question of philosophical and societal limits of being non-binary is a fundamental one for understanding the patterns in the current sign system. Binary, as such, is of a philosophical nature and can be interpreted as political; as in the works of Jacques Derrida and Judith Butler who both accelerated feminist criticism by analysing how the masculine is privileged in the construction of meaning. Also, for Martin Heidegger binary is a subject of criticism as he tried to establish a new dualistic-thinking humanism in which being comes before metaphysical oppositions. The goal of this article is to compare the approaches of these three scholars to find the possibilities, preconditions and limits of non-binary gender. The author argues that the point of clash of their arguments dwells in the interlinkage of thinking, acting and signifying of a politicized material body. All of them problematize authenticity and repetition.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.