Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  DIVISION OF LABOR
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The aim of the paper is to point to: common genetic code of the Corporation, similarity of resources Corporation use in their development, similarity of the ways these resources are used, and hermetic nature of the corporate world. Genetic code consists in: time, size, power over resources, and license. When growing, corporations apply work division and organization of capital. In both instances corporation returns to a starting point: individual employee and individual investor are the objects of interest. Nevertheless, corporate world is open for only those that passed a critical mass in their development as far as the production processes, motivation, quality and board professionalism are concerned. The Polish corporations do not belong to the club.
EN
The paper concentrates on Durkheim's analysis of the sciences and of the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences. The first part deals with Durkheim's description of the anomic division of scientific labor which is manifested in the lack of coordination between the different branches of knowledge. The author comes to the conclusion that the market model is inadequate to describe scientific exchanges and that Durkheim must have felt that. However, he was unable to define a remedy. In later works, he sketched two models, which, according to him, would solve the problem of scientific exchanges. The first one was outlined in his program for the 'Annee sociologique.' There he defined sociology as an interdisciplinary venture which would coordinate the different social sciences, providing methodological unity and assuring the exchange of scientific knowledge. The second model was sketched in Durkheim's history of higher education. There he saw periods of intensive exchange, of collective scientific effervescence where spontaneous cooperation between scientists emerged. In this sense, scientific exchanges would contribute to the establishment of social solidarity itself. Durkheim's answers are inadequate but the problem of scientific cooperation and exchange remains a problem which is not satisfactorily solved.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.