Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  DOGMA
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

DEJINNÝ KONTEXT A TEOLOGICKÉ OTÁZKY DOGMATICKEJ KONŠTITÚCIE PRVÉHO VATIKÁNSKEHO KONCILU DEI FILIUS

100%
Genčúrová G.
Verba Theologica. Teologický časopis
|
2017
|
vol. 16
|
issue 1
31 – 54
EN
The article presents the historical context of the formation of the dogmatic constitution of the First Vatican Council Dei Filius. It systematically describes its content, taking into account its hermeneutical significance in the area of God‘s Revelation, God‘s existence, and the relationship of reason and faith. It critically evaluates the ways of grasping the theological questions and problems of that time, presented in Dei Filius, as a response to the political and church changes of the then-society. At the same time, it points to the consequences of the dogmatization of radical changes in the Church. Finally, it outlines the perspectives of their further development.
2
Content available remote

CHRISTIAN EXEGESES ON EZEKIEL’S PORTA CLAUSA BEFORE THE COUNCILS OF EPHESUS, CONSTANTINOPLE, AND CHALCEDON

72%
Salvador-González J. M.
Konštantínove listy
|
2021
|
vol. 14
|
issue 2
3 - 13
EN
This article aims to highlight the exegetical comments that the Greek-Eastern and Latin Fathers proposed with a Christological and Mariological purpose on Ezekiel’s porta clausa before or during the Councils of Ephesus (431), Constantinople (448) and Chalcedon (451). Although at first sight it would seem that such exegeses were a consequence of these Councils. It is clear that many of them are documented earlier, and others occurred more or less by the time in which these Councils took place. All the Greek-Eastern and Latin Fathers agree in interpreting this oriental closed door of the temple in Mariological and Christological terms, in the sense that it is a simultaneous and complementary symbol of the both the virginal divine maternity of Mary and her perpetual virginity, as well as the conception and birth of God the Son made man. As such interpretations are previous or, in the best case, contemporary to the three mentioned Councils, they can not be considered as their consequences, but rather as some antecedents that could have served the Church in those Councils to refute the heresies of Nestorius and Eutychius.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.