Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Daugavpils
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rola polskojęzycznych mediów lokalnych w krzewieniu kultury polskiej w Łatgalii (na Łotwie)

100%
Rubene D., Uniwersytet Daugavpilski [Daugavpils Universitāte] Ł., Diana Rubene – doktor nauk humanistycznych w zakresie językoznawstwa (Uniwersytet Daugawpilski) a. f. p. n. U. J. W. l. a. k. R. i. S. U. D. J. z. n. k. s. w. z. j. p., dianarubene@inbox.lv
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica
|
2015
|
vol. 29
|
issue 3
EN
The paper presents information about the Polish media in the Latgale region – an area with the largest concentration of Poles in Latvia. Media of this type operate with the support of, among others, the Polish Senate and various foundations. The beginnings of the Polish-language media in Latgale date back to the late 1990s. In cooperation with different Polish organizations, Polish media in the region (mainly radio and television) activate and integrate the Polish diaspora, as well as provide information about the everyday life of Poles in Latgale. What is more, such media play an important role in popularizing the Polish language and culture.
2

Między Rzeczpospolitą a Moskwą – Dyneburg i Inflanty Polskie w latach 1665–1667

100%
Bobiatyński K.
Zapiski Historyczne
|
2011
|
vol. 76
|
issue 3
37-55
XX
The article discusses military and diplomatic aspects of the fight conducted between Poland and Muscovy for Daugavpils and the so-called Polish Livonia in the final stage of the great war from the years 1654-1667 (in the years 1665-1667). It was the last stage of the battle for the south-eastern part of Livonia, conducted from 1654 between the Rzeczpospolita, Muscovy and Sweden. In July 1655 Daugavpils and Latgalia were conquered by the Swedish army; after the outbreak of the Russian-Swedish war, in July 1656 the territory was taken over by the army of Tsar Aleksey Mikhailovich. In 1661 the Swedes renounced their claims to this part of Livonia on the power of the Peace of Kardis. Having started the attack in the eastern front in 1660 for a very long time the Grand Duchy of Lithuania did not have enough power to regain the territory. That is why until 1665 badly trained and undisciplined voluntary units took part in the battle of Daugava. They were not capable of taking over Daugavpils, but they hindered communication and disorganized the life of the garrison. It was not until September 1665 that the attack of I. Chowański was driven back and Lithuania Field Hetman Michał Kazimierz Pac started the blockade of Daugavpils with 3000-4000 soldiers. It was successful and it would have led to the capitulation of the garrison had it not been for a complicated internal situation in Lithuania and the necessity to draw the Lithuanian army back to the Crown to fight with the Lubomirski Rebellion ( the Rokosz) in 1666. On 28 March 1666 I. Chowański managed to break the ring of the siege and to force the Lithuanian units to go back to the southern bank of Daugava. Although the Lithuanians stayed there until the beginning of June, they did not constitute any threat to the garrison of Daugavpils. The article also presents the policy of the Curlandish duke Jacob Kettler in this period and his attempts to maintain neutrality in the conflict between the Rzeczpospolita and Muscovy. His policy made it more di cult for the Lithuanian army to regain Livonia. The problem of Latgalia was not solved until the last stage of the peace negotiations in Andrusovo. The Muscovites did not want to agree to give back the territory, which constituted one of the major obstacles to finish the negotiations. It was not until 7 January 1667 that the tsar’s commissaries declared to give back Daugavpils, which was taken over by the Lithuanians in March 1667. Until the partition of the Rzeczpospolita in 1771 the city remained within the boundaries of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as an important stronghold on the northern frontier and the administrative centre of Latgalia
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Atak na przedmoście Dyneburga 27–28 września 1919 r. Relacja dowódcy dyonu pociągów pancernych kpt. Michała Münnicha

58%
Münnich M. M.
Przegląd Historyczno-Wojskowy
|
2018
|
vol. XIX (LXX)
|
issue 3-4 (265-266)
241-273
EN
The article presents an unpublished account of the battles for the Daugavpils bridgehead on September 27th–28th, 1919. Its author is Capt. Michał Münnich, commander of the two Polish armoured trains „Śmiały-Szeroki” and „Śmigły” participating in the fights. The first part of the account also cites the previously unpublished order of Col. Juliusz Rómmel, then commander of the First Artillery Brigade, concerning the use of Polish artillery in the battle. The second part describes the activities of Polish armoured trains. Basing on the report, a broader analysis of the activities of Polish artillery is presented, and several inaccuracies concerning the participation of armoured trains in the fights, found in subject matter literature, are clarified. The article concludes with the presentation of the author of the report, especially his participation in the 1918–1920 fights.
RU
Статья содержит публикуемое впервые описание битв за даугавпилский тет-де-пон 27–28 сентября 1919 г. Его автор - капитан Михал Мюнних, командующий участвующих в битвах двух польских бронетанковых машин „Щмялы-Шероки” („Śmiały-Szeroki”) и „Щмиглы” („Śmigły”). В первой части отчета цитируется также ранее не публикованный приказ полковника Юлиуша Руммеля, в те времена - командующего Первой Бригадой Артиллерии, касающийся использования в битвах польской артиллерии. Вторая часть описывает действия польских бронетанковых машин. На основе текста отчета был проведен широкий анализ действий польской артиллерии, а также выяснен ряд появляющихся в тематической литературе неточностей, касающихся участия бронетанковых машин в битвах. Статья завершается представлением автора отчета и в особенности его участия в битвах в 1918–1920 гг.
PL
Artykuł przedstawia nigdy niepublikowany opis walk o przedmoście Dyneburga w dniach 27–28 września 1919 r. Jego autorem jest kpt. Michał Münnich, dowódca uczestniczących w walkach dwóch polskich pociągów pancernych „Śmiały-Szeroki” oraz „Śmigły”. Pierwsza część relacji cytuje także dotychczas niepublikowany rozkaz płk. Juliusza Rómmla, ówczesnego dowódcy I Brygady Artylerii, dotyczący użycia w walkach polskiej artylerii. Druga część opisuje działania polskich pociągów pancernych. W oparciu o tekst relacji przedstawiono szerszą analizę dotyczącą działań polskiej artylerii oraz sprostowano wiele pojawiających się w literaturze przedmiotu nieścisłości dotyczących udziału w walkach pociągów pancernych. Artykuł kończy przedstawienie autora relacji, szczególnie jego udziału w walkach w latach 1918–1920.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.