Results found: 1

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: De exilio

Sort By:

Limit search:

Note critiche sul De exilio di Favorino di Arelate (Pap. Vat. Gr. 11 verso – 19,1; 20,4; 22,1; 22,3)

100%

Lapini W.

Eirene. Studia Graeca et Latina

2015

vol. 51

issue 1-2

59-67

Textual notes on Favorinus’ De exilio (Pap. Vat. Gr. 11 verso). In ch. 19,1, I suggest <α> μοι παρεσ̣τ̣ι̣ν εικοτως εμαυτου τιθεμαι και καλω instead of <ε>μοι γαρ εσ̣τ̣ι̣ν κτλ. (Tepedino Guerra), which would be repetitive and redundant. In ch. 20,4, I propose ατιμωσιν instead of α τιμωσιν; the ink trace in the spacing between the lines 14 and 15 seems to be a gamma; so the editors suppose that the copyist tried to correct αυριον δ’ in αυριόν γ’. More probably this trace is an apostrophe and not a gamma. Thus the only attested reading is αὔριον δ’. In ch. 22,1, I would read συμπαν or συναπαν instead of ειναι παν, which is syntactically untenable. In ch. 22,3, I propose οι [δε] τουναντιον instead of ου [δε] τουναντιον, which would imply a too complex structure.

Refine search results

1 Eirene. Studia Graeca et Latina

1 Lapini W.

1 2015

Search results

Note critiche sul De exilio di Favorino di Arelate (Pap. Vat. Gr. 11 verso – 19,1; 20,4; 22,1; 22,3)