Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Definitions
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Beyond the Myth / Philosophy Dichotomy. Foundations for an Interdependent Perspective

100%
Tofighian O.
Forum Philosophicum
|
2010
|
vol. 15
|
issue 1
175-189
EN
Philosophy vs. myth; argument vs. narrative. Are these oppositions outdated clichés or are they realistic dichotomies with universal application? Definitions of myth are often confronted with exceptions. Mythic themes and elements regularly surface in philosophy, and vice versa. The boundary separating myth and philosophy continues to be redrawn and the status of the two continually reevaluated. By moving away from an all-encompassing definition of myth I aim to propose a foundation upon which an interdependent relationship between myth and philosophy can be interpreted. New possibilities for interconnection between the two will be suggested along with more compelling questions on which to base inquiries.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Problemy definicyjne kapitału relacyjnego w literaturze zarządzania

86%
Żukowska J., Kołodziejczyk D., Mechło P.
Studia Ekonomiczne
|
2018
|
vol. 351
9-21
PL
Istotnym problemem w zakresie kapitału relacyjnego jest brak jego precyzyjnej definicji. Autorki badań podjęły próbę stworzenia definicji obejmującej najważniejsze elementy, które pojawiają się w definicjach tej formy kapitału. Ponadto w artykule zaprezentowano poziom zainteresowania terminem kapitału relacyjnego w latach 2006-2017. Zastosowane metody badawcze obejmują analizę i krytykę piśmiennictwa oraz analizę popularności słów kluczowych z wybranych baz naukowych.
EN
A major problem in the field of relational capital is its lack of a precise definition. The authors of studies have attempted to create a definition of the major elements that appear in the definitions of this form of capital. Furthermore, the article presents level of interest in relational capital in 2006-2017. The research methods used include the analysis and critique of literature and analysis of the popularity of keywords selected scientific bases.
3

Humanistyka cyfrowa: problemy definiowania pojęcia

72%
Ucińska J.
Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne
|
2017
|
vol. 55
|
issue 1(109)
124-145
PL
CEL/TEZA: Celem artykułu jest próba wskazania kluczowych cech pojęcia humanistyki cyfrowej (HC) oraz zrozumienie, co naprawdę jest rozumiane przez to pojęcie. KONCEPCJA/METODY BADAŃ: Autorka analizuje najbardziej charakterystyczne cechy pojawiające się w definicjach digital humanities w naukowej literaturze anglojęzycznej oraz zestawia je z cechami najczęściej pojawiającymi się w polskich definicjach pojęcia humanistyka cyfrowa. WYNIKI I WNIOSKI: Wynik badań jest negatywny – nie jest możliwe stworzenie jednego zestawu cech HC, ale możliwe jest wskazanie takich właściwości humanistyki cyfrowej, co do których większość badaczy jest zgodna. ORYGINALNOŚĆ/WARTOŚĆ POZNAWCZA: Największą wartość poznawczą pracy stanowi fakt, że jest to pierwsza systematyczna analiza oraz zestawienie definicji polskich i anglojęzycznych humanistyki cyfrowej.
EN
PURPOSE/THESIS: This article attempts to indicate a set of the most common features of digital humanities (DH) and to determine what the term DH really means. APPROACH METHODS: The author examines English and Polish scientific articles discussing the definitions of digital humanities and juxtaposes them. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The result is negative as it is not possible to create one set of digital humanities features, nevertheless it is possible to find some most often occurring features. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This article provides the first systematic analysis and compilation of Polish and English-language definitions of the digital humanities.
4

Humanity and Animality. A Transdisciplinary Approach

58%
Guillaume A.
Human and Social Studies
|
2013
|
vol. 2
|
issue 3
13-32
EN
At a time when humanity experiences its greatest advances, major conflicts and abuses arise around the world due to a lack of humanism and reason within the meaning of the Enlightenment. Modernity and western comfort in our globalized society have not helped share and balance the wealth, nor preserve the natural resources; it has not prevented crimes against humanity nor the most insane dictatorial actions of the 20th and early 21st centuries. This went hand in hand with a massive degradation of the environment. Could the animal be the solution to all the mistakes we have made during the last century, instead of being considered an inferior, a slave? Could he not be the one who has managed the best in the fields of intelligence, self-regulation and respect of his vital environment? Should we not rather turn toward the animal to find a new balanced model? Respecting the environment and his peers seems to be the most striking evidence of intelligence, does it not? The animal has achieved this. Man has not. Focusing on the way man has treated animals may therefore help us to understand why we have treated our peers so badly.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.