Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Democratic Deficit
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Demokracia a jej budúcnosť v Európskej únii

100%
Baraník K.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2017
|
vol. 156
|
issue 3
235-256
EN
This article deals with a conflict analysis of national and international components within the EU internal architecture.Although EU was originally founded as an international organization, increasing level of integration has gradually amplified the demand for democratic requirements, reaching almost the intensity known in the national states. An insufficient presence of democracy has been one of the most fundamental difficulties that EU has been addressing since its inception. Another stream of democratic enhancements in its legal basis, however, could alter the organization’s architecture, which has been still based on international law. The consensual form of decision-making, however, was one of the main reasons why the European integration has been so successful, and why national resistances to the ongoing integration has been so extremely exceptional. The tension between the need for democratization and the effort to accommodate the confidence of member states was always decisive in the amendment processes of founding treaties. Nowadays, more than ever, EU must respond to even more complex challenges that have been questioning its existence and functioning persistently. This contribution will try to respond to the outlined issues of democracy in EU. At the same time, it will analyse and suggest the possibilities that should be taken into consideration when addressing mentioned pressing issues.
SK
Príspevok sa zaoberá analýzou konfliktu štátoprávnych a medzinárodných elementov vo vnútri právnej architektúry Európskej únie. EÚ bola pôvodne založená ako medzinárodná organizácia, no v dôsledku postupného prehlbovania integrácie sa na ňu začali klásť mnohé demokratické požiadavky, typické skôr pre štátne entity ako medzinárodné organizácie.Nedostatok demokracie bol jedným zo základných problémov, s ktorými sa EÚ musela počas svojich vývojových štádií vysporiadať.Ďalšie posilňovanie demokratických elementov v právnej štruktúre EÚ však môže zmeniť konštrukciu organizácie, ktorá je dodnes „postavená“ na medzinárodnoprávnych základoch. Medzinárodnoprávna konsenzuálna povaha rozhodovania však bola jedným zo zásadných dôvodov prečo bola európska integrácia tak úspešným projektom a prečo sa národné rezistencie s integrovaním vyskytovali len sporadicky.Napätie medzi potrebou demokratizácie a snahou neprísť o dôveru členských štátov bolo určujúcim faktorom pri všetkých reformách zakladajúcich zmlúv. Dnes však musí EÚ neustále reagovať na komplikovanejšie výzvy, ktoré stále zásadnejšie spochybňujú jej organizáciu a fungovanie. Tento príspevok sa pokúsi na naznačené tendencie týkajúce sa demokracie v EÚ reagovať. Súčasne bude analyzovať možnosti, ktoré by pri riešení uvedených problémov mali byť zvažované.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Unijna kontrola praworządności – uwagi de lege ferenda

86%
Rulka M.
Studia Europejskie-Studies in European Affairs
|
2016
|
vol. 2
53-69
EN
On the basis of the Treaty of Nice, the European Union institutions have obtained a crucial right to inspection rule of law in its Member States, encompassing the areas of law being within their exclusive competence. The main aim of the study is to analyze the legitimacy of this extensive intrusion European Union in particular from the point of view of the objectives of this organization. The author indicates that the area in which the European Union has a real interest are the elections to the national authorities that participate in the European Union legislative procedure. Election of this authorities in undemocratic procedure weakens – already undermined – legitimacy of the European Union. The author postulates thereby limiting the scope of this control.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.