Search results

1

Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zaproszenia posła na rozmowy kwalifikacyjne

100%

Gierach E.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2013

|

issue 2(38)

177-180

EN

The opinion deals with the participation of a Deputy to the Sejm in a recruitment interview in the capacity of observer. The author address the issue in the context of an informal activity of a Deputy and claims that his/her attendance during a recruitment interview could only be admissible with consent of those participating in the interview. She also examines the issue of exclusion of public nature of particular information during such interview, stating that an attendance of a Deputy is inadmissible when such information is protected by secrecy under the provisions resulting from statutes other than the Act on the Protection of Classified Information.

2

Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zgłoszenia wniosku o odwołanie członka prezydium komisji przez posła niebędącego członkiem komisji

100%

Gierach E.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2013

|

issue 2(38)

181-184

EN

The opinion addresses the question of autonomy of a Sejm committee in the situation when a Deputy who is not its member – exercising his/her right to take part in a committee meeting and making motions – puts a motion to recall a member of the presidium (bureau) of that committee. The author gives her opinion, based on her own interpretation of the provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, that such motion should be considered admissible, since there is no legal basis that would make that motion illegitimate.

3

Opinia prawna na temat skarg kierowanych przez posłów do organów władzy sądowniczej

80%

Czarny P.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2015

|

issue 3(47)

184-189

EN

The author of this opinion analyzes the possibility of recognition as Deputy’s intervention his/her application with a letter to the First President of the Supreme Court for “immediate intervention” in a particular case previously examined by the Supreme Court. In the opinion of the recipient, that document should be considered as a violation of independence of the judiciary. The author of the opinion comes to the conclusion that this letter goes beyond the regulation of the so-called Deputy’s intervention, due to the fact that judicial authorities are not those bodies to which – under this legal institution – Deputies may address their concerns. The said letter may also be viewed on the basis of the provisions of the Code of Administrative Procedure regarding the complaint. Analyzing the document in the context of the provisions of the Constitution, the author claims that the character of the letter may be the sign of actions taken to exert influence the decision-making process, which would be beyond the scope of the technical and administrative services (the so-called court administration).

4

Opinia prawna na temat prawa dostępu do informacji i materiałów od organów administracji samorządowej w trybie ustawy o wykonywaniu mandatu posła i senatora i ustawy o dostępie do informacji publicznej

80%

Wojnarska‑Krajewska E.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2014

|

issue 1(41)

347-352

EN

The author claims that anybody, including a Deputy to the Sejm, has – on the basis of the Act on Access to Public Information – the right of access to a document having the form of an contract concluded by the local government unit (gmina). In such a case, the disclosure of the first names and surnames of persons concluding a civil‑law contract with a self‑government unit does not violate the right to privacy of those persons. However, some information concerning persons concluding such contract may remain anonymous. According to the author, information (documents) pertaining to the domain of plan or aims of the given authority ( and not to the facts) – provided that they have been drawn up to be used in proceedings in a particular case related to the legal interest of that authority – should not be disclosed under the Act on Access to Public Information.

5

Opinia prawna w sprawie ujawniania w Rejestrze Korzyści zagranicznej wizyty sfinansowanej przez zapraszającego odbytej przez posła jako członka zespołu parlamentarnego

70%

Galińska-Rączy I.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2012

|

issue 4(36)

218-226

EN

The article addresses the question of whether an invitation to members of parliamentary team to visit a foreign country at the expense of the inviting party should be declared in the Register of Interests (referred to in Article 35a(3)(4) of the Act on the Exercise of the Mandate of a Deputy or Senator). The author concludes that such visit should be declared by Deputies in the Register of Interests. The situation would be different if the supposed trip was at the same time that referred to Article 7(8)(2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, i.e. a trip made at the request of the Sejm, the Marshal of the Sejm or a committee, and approved by the Presidium of the Sejm. Therefore, it might be treated as a trip connected with the performance of a mandate of a Deputy and, hence, would not be subject to declaration in the Register.

Refine search results

5 Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

2 Gierach E.

1 Czarny P.

1 Galińska-Rączy I.

1 Wojnarska‑Krajewska E.

1 2015

1 2014

2 2013

1 2012

Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zaproszenia posła na rozmowy kwalifikacyjne

Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zgłoszenia wniosku o odwołanie członka prezydium komisji przez posła niebędącego członkiem komisji

Opinia prawna na temat skarg kierowanych przez posłów do organów władzy sądowniczej

Opinia prawna na temat prawa dostępu do informacji i materiałów od organów administracji samorządowej w trybie ustawy o wykonywaniu mandatu posła i senatora i ustawy o dostępie do informacji publicznej

Opinia prawna w sprawie ujawniania w Rejestrze Korzyści zagranicznej wizyty sfinansowanej przez zapraszającego odbytej przez posła jako członka zespołu parlamentarnego