Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Studia Gdańskie

Authors help

  1. 1 Niewiadomski J.

  2. 1 Paulin M.

Years help

  1. 2 2013

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Dramatische Theologie
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Victima versus Sacrificium. Ambivalenz des Opfers aus der Perspektive der Innsbrucker Dramatischen Theologie

100%
Niewiadomski J.
Studia Gdańskie
|
2013
|
issue 32
119-140
DE
Im kulturpolitischen und religionstheologischen Diskurs der Gegenwart spielt nicht nur der Opferbegriff eine zentrale Rolle, sondern auch dessen Ambivalenz. Die Opfer werden ja oft zu Tätern und rechtfertigen ihr Tun mit dem Hinweis auf das Opfersein. Der Teufelskreis der Täter‑Opfer‑Täter‑Logik scheint heute ungebrochen zu sein. Unter Rückgriff auf die mimetische Theorie von René Girard sucht die Innsbrucker Dramatischen Theologie den Teufelskreis zu sprengen. Die Unterscheidung zwischen der mythischen Logik des Heidentums, die das Opfer im mimetischen Taumel sakralisiert, damit auch Viktimisierungen fördert und der opferkritischen Logik der biblischen Tradition spielt dabei eine zentrale Rolle. Gott will Opfer nicht, doch nachdem Christus von den Menschen hingerichtet wird, verwandelt er kraft seiner Sohnesidentität die Destruktivität der Viktimisierung in die lebensfördernde Hingabe.
EN
In contemporary discussions on cultural, political, religious and theological issues, aimportant place is occupied not only by the victim, but the ambivalence that is assoated with it. Victims often become offenders. They refer to the fact of being a victim, that justifies this type of behavior. It seems that there is no way of „diabolical circoffender‑victim‑offender. The Dramatic Theology which was developed in Innsbrucgives an opportunity to find a way out of this circle. It uses the results of René Girarmimetic theory. It is important to distinguish between the mythical logic of pagaism, in which the process of sacralization takes place, and the biblical tradition whiccondemns this logic. Christ preaches the Gospel (Good News) of his Father who is entirely free of violence. As a result he himself becomes an object of people’s aggressioWithout compulsion he responds with no violence and in this way he transforms tdestructive forces of sacral violence in loving devotion to the Father.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Fallibilismus als Anwalt der Opfer Der kritische Schlüssel René Girards und seine Parallelen im kritischen Rationalismus

86%
Paulin M.
Studia Gdańskie
|
2013
|
issue 32
15-38
DE
Die mimetische Theorie René Girards mit ihrem Instrumentar zur Opferkritik einerseits und die von Karl Popper entwickelte Methodologie des kritischen Rationalismus, welche im heutigen wissenschaftstheoretischen und erkenntnistheoretischen Diskurs fak tisch als allgemein akzeptiert gelten kann, andererseits weisen eine große systematische Affinität zueinander auf. Dies weist dieser Beitrag zunächst mit einer Analyse des Girard’schen Wissenschaftsverständnisses nach. Da nach werden typische Missverständnisse und Engführungen der beiden Ansätze in ihrer Analogie betrachtet und ihr Zustandekommen aus der mimetischen Perspektive heraus erklärt. Dabei zeigt sich, dass auch die Mimetische Theorie einen – recht verstandenen – Fallibilismus impliziert, der theoretisch wie auch ethisch‑praktisch motiviert ist.
EN
Providing a critical instrument to identify structures of victimization, René Girard’s program is in fact very affine to Critical Rationalism methodology as developed by Charles Popper and widely assented in contemporary epistemology. In order to proof this thesis, in a first step, Girard’s understanding of epistemology is reconstructed. His occasionally very strict objection to any form of relativism thereby is shown to be due to an obviously polemic context. In claiming his theory to be scientific, Girard indeed knows very well that it is the specification of science to approach things not apodicti cally, but hypothetically, and he clearly assents this principle. In a second step, typical misunderstandings of both the Mimetic Theory and Poppers fallibilism are analysed and parallelized. They properly consist in an exaggeration of some aspects, while com plementary aspects are suppressed. With the Mimetic Theory, just this uneven exag geration can be explained as happening precisely in constellations of rivalry, as among the „hostile brothers”, and yet as happening unintentionally and therefore being so hard to detect. Therefore, the claim of showing this connection, as raised by the Mimetic Theory, itself cannot be presented in an apodictic manner because it so would force the counterpart into rivalry about the alleged truth, which would so again deform it, NB on both sides of the disputation. Besides this rather „ethical” reason, there also is a strongly „epistemic” reason why Mimetic Theory and the uncovering of scapegoat mechanism should consider themselves to be hypothetical and fallible: Without a continuous rising of this self‑critical attitude, the self‑vindicatory and self‑enclosing spell of myth would have never been broken.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.