Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  EASTERN ORTHODOX CHURCH
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

KRISTOLÓGIA VO SVETLE VYBRANÝCH KATECHIZMOV VÝCHODU A ZÁPADU

100%
Haraj I.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2016
|
vol. 51
|
issue 2
103 -117
EN
The first major schism in Christianity represents the separation of the Oriental Orthodox Churches from the rest of the Church. Political tensions between the Byzantine Empire and the separatist provinces and also cultural and linguistic differences contributed to the Christological controversies in the 5th century AD. Today the both parties recognise, that their Christology is orthodox, it is only expressed by different theological formulations and terms. The common theological assumption was confirmed by analysis of selected Oriental, Eastern Orthodox and Catholic catechisms. Doctrine of the Oriental catechisms is made available in Slovakia for the first time.
2
Content available remote

O NADŠENCÍCH A VZDĚLANÝCH TEOLOZÍCH ANEB JEŠTĚ JEDNOU K JEDNOMU PŘEKLADU

58%
Hrdinová E.
Studia theologica
|
2012
|
vol. 14
|
issue 2
118–132
EN
The study deals with one of the youngest translations of St. John Chrysostom’s Eastern liturgy into Czech. The translation analysed represents an innovative act not only within the Eastern Orthodox Church, but also outside it, and for many reasons has been accepted in different ways. The study also aims at providing space to critical voices and endeavours to discuss these views in the context of theory and practice of translation. Equally, it strives for an complete analysis of the linguistic-translatological characteristics of the translations by Marek Krupica and Jiří Stránský. One of the important factors of the concerned translation by Krupica and Stránský was an attempt at an intelligible Czech language which could be used for liturgical purposes as well. On the textual layer, there is the already mentioned intelligibility which does not contradict the observance of the textual poetics. After all, these two factors are not easy to observe, in particular regarding the translation of poetry. Marek Krupica and Jiří Stránský give preference to generally known, mostly Christian terms, such as Bohorodička [Mother of God] or svátosti [sacraments]. These terms replace the previously used borrowings, such as Bohorodice [Mother of God, an older term] or Tajiny [mysteries] which are still found e.g. in Gorazd’s Dictionary. These terms appear in the text in symbiosis with the eastern terms, such as aer [aër], diskos [paten], tropar [troparion]. Despite these innovative tendencies, the text maintains a number of poetic figures and tropes. It also does not avoid word-order inversions. Therefore, the text does not lack a certain “eastern touch” and at the same time does not seem archaic or bookish. The translation strategy thus unites all the factors mentioned here, without making a fragmented or split impression. In the given context, e.g. a translation of theological vocabulary is carried out. In this sense, the focus of this contribution is shifted from one particular translated text to general problems of translatability of certain cultural background, or the choice between free and word-for-word translation. This choice has been known in the history of translation since at least the time of Hieronymus’ Vulgata.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.