Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ELSPAC
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The study examines 15-year-old respondents of study ELSPAC descriptions of representation of term „to date somebody“ and their descriptions of advantages and disadvantages of romantic relationships. The majority of adolescents currently have of had dating experiences in the past. We noticed that girls appeared to have more to say than boys about meaning of „dating“ and about negative aspects of romantic relationships. Respondents were the most likely mention general descriptions of romantic relationships. The second category was created by affiliative characteristics of romantic relationships (shared leisure activities, humor, fun etc.). Advantages of romantic relationships more than disadvantages characterized these adolescents’ views of this type of close relationship.
CS
Studie představuje reprezentace pojmu „chodit s někým“, jak jej popisují patnáctiletí adolescenti, respondenti studie ELSPAC. Dále shrnuje, co dospívající pokládají za výhody a nevýhody romantického/partnerského vztahu. Většina patnáctiletých adolescentů udávala, že momentálně prožívá nebo v minulosti již prožila partnerský vztah. Více výpovědí o tom, co si představují pod pojmem „chodit s někým“ a také více nevýhod udávaly dívky oproti chlapcům. V rozhovorech adolescenti reagovali na otázku „co to podle Tebe znamená chodit s někým“ nejčastěji odpověďmi obecného charakteru. Druhá nejčetnější kategorie v sobě zahrnovala výpovědi, které jsou charakteristické pro reprezentaci přátelství – společné volnočasové aktivity, humor, zábava atd. Celkově adolescenti méně uvažovali o negativních aspektech romantického vztahu a v hodnocení převažovaly spíše přínosy a zisky.
EN
This article presents research on value preferences of eleven-year-old fifth grade pupils. Differences between two groups of gifted pupils were observed - between 71 contemporary pupils and 229 pupils in ELSPAC in the years 2002 - 03. The identical identification criteria were used in the selection of both groups. By selecting questions from the ELSPAC questionnaires we compared the value preferences data of both of the gifted groups. We were dealing with research questions: which values the gifted prefer in friends, which priorities of life values they have, and which one is the most important for them. No statistically significant differences were found in the comparison of the majority of the values of the two groups. In the evaluation of friends, all the respondents most preferred the item “how you get along“ and then “their reliability“. The most significant difference was found in the item “the gain from your friendship with them“ which moved from the 15t to the 5t place in 10 years. No statistically significant differences were found in the question of life values between the two groups of gifted children in our data set except for the item “personal property,“ which was more important for the gifted of 2012. The most important value for both of the groups was “family relations“ ahead of the item “health“ and “having friends“.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.