Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Emanuel Rádl
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Emanuel Rádl, teologická struktura jeho filosofického myšlení

100%
Samohýl J.
Filosofický časopis (Philosophical Journal)
|
2008
|
vol. 56
|
issue 3
373-395
EN
This article is primarily concerned with examining the structure of the philosophical opinions of Emanuel Rádl, and it demonstrates the theological and religious contexts of his thought. Professor E. Rádl, a quite exceptional and generally controversial figure, predominantly from the time of the First Republic, was known for his extraordinary social activity, both publicational and political. The aim of this text is, however, to present Emanuel Rádl as an original religious thinker and to show the religious structure of his philosophical thought.
2
Content available remote

Realismus a moralismus v díle Emanuela Rádla

44%
Hejduk T.
Filosofický časopis (Philosophical Journal)
|
2014
|
vol. 62
|
issue 3
387-402
EN
An analysis of Rádl’s Útěcha z filosofie (The Consolation of Philosophy) reveals it to be a work in which Rádl, ailing and overcome by events, resorts to mere moralising. It is my view that, even here, he maintains the full dynamic unity of wordly reality, which governs life itself, and abstract morality, which is supported by philosophical theories and systems. Despite the fact that many theses and concepts in the Consolation give the impression of a stereotypical moralising of life (“The Moral Order”), we always find in the text, alongside these themes, counterbalancing realist theses (life itself, the individual). I understand this balance between a concrete and a moral approach to human life as the principle reason for treating Rádl as closer to Socrates than to Plato (on the basis of the conception of the difference between Socrates and Plato in “Eternity and Historicity”, I take issue with Patočka’s “Platonic” interpretation of Rádl).
3
Content available remote

Rádl’s criticism of the Czech individualist inter-war philosophy

38%
Potoček J.
Filosofický časopis (Philosophical Journal)
|
2021
|
vol. 69
|
issue Special_Issue_1
41-56
EN
A significant share of the “struggles” that took place within Czechoslovak inter-war philosophy lay in criticism raised by Emanuel Rádl, the representative of the realistic approach, against the adherents of individualism or the younger philosophical generation surrounding the magazine Ruch filosofický. From a philosophical and methodological point of view, the core of Rádl’s critical position is philosophical realism. Rádl’s realistic stance was gradually forming and developing during the periods running up to and following the First World War, while the experience and fear of the consequences of Russian philosophy based on mysticism, intuitivism and idealism, proved to be the tipping point. Besides that, the change in his stance towards Kant’s philosophy, which consisted of highlighting the positive aspect of his rationalism, was yet another significant turnabout. From his post-war realist position, Rádl proceeded to criticise the alienation, apoliticism and amorality of the philosophy of individualism and the interest of its representatives in the philosophical approaches of irrationalism: mysticism, intuitivism and spiritualism.
4
Content available remote

Demokratická republika a filosofická kritika: československý příběh

36%
Šimsa M.
Filosofický časopis (Philosophical Journal)
|
2023
|
vol. 71
|
issue 4
677-696
EN
In this study, the author investigates, analyzes and evaluates the philosophically and politically important, interactive role played by criticism in forming and maintaining the concept of a democratic republic, and which played a fundamental role in the philosophical and political works of T. G. Masaryk, Emanuel Rádl, Jan Patočka, Ladislav Hejdánek and Erazim Kohák. The study first describes Masaryk’s concept of a democratic republic, which originated in his philosophical, social and political criticism of the time, and then continues with Rádl’s criticism of nationalism, also linked to Masaryk; Patočka’s criticism of Masaryk’s and Rádl’s philosophy and politics; and Hejdánek’s and Kohák’s criticism of Patočka’s criticism. Philosophical criticism played an irreplaceable role both in the initial sustaining of Masaryk’s and Rádl’s concept of a democratic republic and in its renewal and modernization. In the conclusion, the critical discourse of the authors discussed in the study is summarized.
CS
V této studii autor zkoumá, analyzuje a hodnotí filosoficky i politicky významnou interaktivní roli kritiky při vytváření a udržování konceptu demokratické republiky. Právě kritika totiž zaujímala zcela zásadní místo ve filosofickém i politickém díle T. G. Masaryka, Emanuela Rádla, Jana Patočky, Ladislava Hejdánka a Erazima Koháka. Autor nejprve přibližuje Masarykův koncept demokratické republiky, který se zrodil z jeho dobové filosofické, společenské a politické kritiky, následně pak Rádlovu kritiku nacionalismu, vztaženou i na Masarykovy postoje, poté Patočkovu kritiku Masarykovy a Rádlovy filosofie i politiky a v závěru pak Hejdánkovu a Kohákovu kritiku Patočkovy kritiky. Na základě svých analýz dospívá posléze k závěru, že filosofická kritika sehrála nezastupitelnou roli jak v počátečním udržení Masarykova a Rádlova konceptu demokratické republiky, tak při jeho obnově a aktualizaci. V závěru stati pak autor představuje vlastní kritický diskurz analyzovaných autorů.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.