Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Emperor
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Volba a korunovace Karla VI. římským císařem v roce 1711

100%
Kubeš J.
Český časopis historický (The Czech Historical Review)
|
2013
|
vol. 111
|
issue 4
805-841
EN
Based on the existing literature, contemporary printed materials and especially primary sources from the Bohemian Court Chancellary and the Family Archives of the Windisch- Grätz family, the author attempts, for the first time ever in a Czech historiography to deal comprehensively with the election and coronation of Charles VI in 1711. This text has two main purposes. Primarily, it involves a more comprehensive revisiting of the events after the death of Emperor Joseph I (April) in Vienna at the court of the Regent Empress dowager Eleonora Magdalena, at the court of Charles III of Spain in Barcelona, or possibly also in Milan, yet, especially in Frankfurt am Main. There, the pre-electoral negotiations, attended by the Bohemian electoral embassy took place, during which an electoral capitulation was drafted after approximately two months and the proper ceremonial election of Charles as King of the Romans (October) took place. Thereafter, the imperial coronation followed, yet again after an interval of two months (December). In second part, the author researches the events of 1711 in a wider context and compares them with preceding elections and coronations. He attempts to discover to what degree these processes were similar, or to what extent they differed from one another and to establish the reasons why deviations from traditions, which people in the Early Modern Ages held so dear, occurred; who benefited from these innovations and how they influenced the functioning of the Empire as a whole.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Characteristics of Political Institutions in the Meiji period

100%
Králiková I.
Prague Papers on the History of International Relations
|
2022
|
issue 2
21-35
EN
Newly created institutions: the Japanese government and Diet brought Japan closer to the advanced modern countries, which was the goal of all the reforms the new government sought. This complex and difficult process has had positive results and has met the expectations of its creators. Among other things, the reformers succeeded in involving the entire population in the process of modernising the country. The purpose of the creation of the House of Peers was to involve the entire nobility, both court and military, in participation in governance. In addition, the reforms of the noble titles also brought together the court aristocracy and the military nobility. In addition, representatives of the former lower nobility were elevated to the level of the formerly high-ranking nobility as a reward for their contribution to establishing the new political order. The creation of modern governmental institutions was necessary above all to strengthen Japan’s international position. The newly established Diet, although its powers were limited, was also of great significance in that it involved all sections of society in participating in the modernisation of the country, thus achieving in a relatively short period almost equal status with Western countries.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Aurelian a męczennicy

84%
Suski R.
Vox Patrum
|
2007
|
vol. 50
441-460
EN
The persecution of Christians was stopped after capture of Valerian in June 260. During the forty-three years from 260 to 303 the Christian Church had a relatively comfortable conditions to growth. According to Eusebius of Ceasarea and Lactantius the emperor Aurelian (270-275) wanted to renew the persecution in the last few months of his reign. The emperor was assassinated by a conspiracy of his higher officers and he didn’t realize this plans. We have several accounts of martyrdoms which took place under Aurelian in Italy, Asia Minor, Palestine, Dalmatia and Gaul. The reliability of many of this martyrdoms is doubled. Some of this martyrs were genuine, but they hadn’t been punished during the rule of Aurelian. For example Felix was executed either rule of Valerian or Aurelian. Sometimes authors of acts of martyr confused Aurelian with Marcus Aurelius. The following names of martyrs are fictious. The dates of the martyrdoms don’t fit to chronology for thè end of Aurelian’s rule.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Literature or journalism? The Emperor: A controversial reportage by Ryszard Kapuściński as an image of the authority created by the author and an evidence of his writing mastery.

84%
Zygmunt A.
Kultura i Polityka
|
2014
|
issue 15
128-140
EN
Ryszard Kapuściński, a worldwide-known, prize-winning writer, is also regarded as a controversial author. After his death there are still many people who question the value of his reportages and his credibility as a reporter. In this paper I want to examine the nature of his work on the example of The Emperor: Downfall of an Autocrat. I wish to focus on the way he decided to present his observations from his stays in Ethiopia in the 70s of the 20th century, as well as to find the reasons why he chose a particular writing strategy. This paper seeks to explain the phenomenon of these controversies which tend to place the author either in the world of literature or journalism, as in the title. Furthermore, I will briefly focus on the image of Haile Selassie and his authority as presented in the book. Ryszard Kapuściński described the Ethiopian ruler who already had a big influence on people who surrounded him as he had been on the throne for over forty years. The author of The Emperor examined the relations between those who worked on the court at the time as well. It seems that he found the principles that were followed both there and in the People’s Republic of Poland. In my study, I also want to rely on some other sources such as A Reporter's Self Portrait and Travels with Herodotus by Ryszard Kapuściński and Kapuściński Non-fiction by Artur Domosławski.
PL
Ryszard Kapuściński, autor znany na całym świecie i zdobywca wielu nagród, jest też postacią kontrowersyjną. Po jego śmierci wciąż wiele osób kwestionuje wartość jego reportaży i jego wiarygodność jako reportera. W tym artykule pragnę przyjrzeć się twórczości autora na przykładzie powieści „Cesarz”. Skupię się na sposobie, w jaki opisywał wydarzenia, których był świadkiem podczas swoich pobytów w Etiopii w latach 70. minionego wieku, a także na powodach, dla których mógł zdecydować się na stosowanie wybranej strategii reporterskiej. Jak zasygnalizowałam w tytule, zastanawiam się też nad istotą kontrowersji wokół twórczości Kapuścińskiego (literatura czy dziennikarstwo?). Przyjrzę się również ukazanej w książce postaci cesarza Haile Selassie, którego wpływ na państwo podczas przeszło czterdziestoletnich rządów był potężny. Czytając „Cesarza”, w tym relacje pracowników cesarskiego dworu, ma się wrażenie, że Ryszard Kapuściński widział pewne podobieństwa między tamtym realiami a tymi panującymi w Polskiej Rzeczpospolitej Ludowej. W tekście powołuję się ponadto na inne utwory Kapuścińskiego („Autoportret reportera” i „Podróże z Herodotem”) oraz „Kapuściński Non-fiction” Artura Domosławskiego.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

List papieża Hormizdasa do cesarza Anastazego I

67%
Koczwara S.
Vox Patrum
|
2008
|
vol. 52
|
issue 1
489-494
EN
Hac in brevi dissertatiuncula post introductionem cum annexa bibliographia proponitur prima in linguam Polonorum translatio Epistolae Hormisdae papae ad Anastasium I imperatorem.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Napięcie między świeckością i sakralnością w wizji władcy w "De vita Constantini" Euzebiusza z Cezarei

67%
Królikowski J.
Vox Patrum
|
2002
|
vol. 42
151-160
IT
Nella "De vita Constantini" Eusebio di Cesarea ha realizzato una grande sistematizzazione degli elementi cristiani e pagani riguardanti la visione dell'imperatore e dell'impero, dalla quale - in conseguenza - e sorta la prima visione teologica dell'imperatore cristiano. Una caratteristica specifica di questa visione consiste nella sacralizzazione dell'imperatore e del suo ufficio. Essa non e del tutto univoca poiche si confronta continuamente con la sua mondanita ma - in fin dei conti - il suo elemento dominante e determinante diventa la sacralita. Le sue fonti si trovano sia nella dottrina cristiana che in quella pagana. Eusebio non e riuscito di evitare l'ideologizzazione nella sua impostazione poiche ha trascurato in questa questione - nonostante fosse un grande esegeta - la sensibilita esegetica. La visione di Eusebio dovrebbe essere l'oggetto delle ulteriori ricerche e delle purificazioni poiche continuamente rimane il punto di riferimento del cristianesimo orientale nella sua teologia politica. In ogni caso Eusebio continua ad essere il primo teologo politico del cristianesimo.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The attitude of the pro-Arian bishops towards the emperor in the period of reception of the Nicene Christology (325-381)

67%
Kashchuk O.
Vox Patrum
|
2014
|
vol. 61
137-155
PL
Sobór Nicejski nie położył kresu kontrowersji ariańskiej. Po soborze nastą­pił długi okres walki o recepcję chrystologii nicejskiej. Kontrowersja stała się przedmiotem zainteresowania cesarza, ponieważ postrzegano ją jako zagrożenie dla jedności cesarstwa. Z tego powodu zwyczaj ingerowania cesarza w sprawy kościelne stawał się coraz częstszy i nawet dotyczył nauki Kościoła. Taka sy­tuacja wywołała reakcję biskupów i stała się okazją do określenia roli cesarza w Kościele. W IV w. istniały dwa główne stanowiska w tej kwestii – biskupów proariańskich i antyariańskich. Głównym celem artykułu było ukazanie stanowi­ska biskupów proariańskich wobec cesarza. Analiza źródeł historycznych i lite­ratury wykazała, że ich postawa wobec cesarza nie była ani bezwzględnym pod­porządkowaniem się ani całkowitą niezależnością. Ich model stosunków między Kościołem a państwem został zainspirowany przez Euzebiusza z Cezarei, który przeniósł na grunt chrześcijański antyczną, hellenistyczną teorię polityczną oraz hebrajską koncepcję władcy. W kontekście antycznych idei cesarz jako żywe prawo posiadał szczególną rolę w Kościele. Przejawiała się ona szczególnie na synodach. Biskupi proariańscy dopuścili cesarza do interweniowania nawet w sferę kościelnej doktryny. Ich postawa wobec cesarza znacznie różniła się od modelu wypracowanego w dobie przednicejskiej. Z drugiej jednak strony bisku­pi proariańscy starali się dochować wierności Tradycji Kościoła. Z tego powodu nie mogli uznać cesarza za jego głowę. Zakończenie kontrowersji ariańskiej nie uwolniło Kościoła od zależności od cesarza. Kościół Wschodni w okresie recepcji Credo Nicejskiego został niejako zaprogramowany pod kątem uzależnienia od ce­sarza. W ten sposób postawa proariańskich biskupów legła u podstaw przyszłego bizantyńskiego cezaropapizmu.
8
Content available remote

Státoprávní vyčlenění českých zemí ze Svaté říše římské. Důsledky říšské reformy Maxmiliána I. Habsburského

59%
Vorel P.
Český časopis historický (The Czech Historical Review)
|
2013
|
vol. 111
|
issue 4
743-804
EN
This study continues long-term specialist discussions on the constitutional relationship between the Lands of the Czech Crown and the Holy Roman Empire in the period of the Early Modern Age. With the help of new primary resources, the author focuses on the period 1477–1495 during which the exclusion of the Czech Lands from a newly formed Roman-German Empire took place. The emergence of a new constitutional arrangement was completed through the consent of all four participating parties (King of the Romans – the Imperial Estates – the King of Bohemia – the Czech Estates), therefore it was conflict-free. The exclusion of the Czech Lands from the Empire was not the result of the emancipation struggle of the Czech Estates, whether national or religious, but it occurred within the context of the internal re-structuralisation of the Empire at the beginning of the Imperial Reform of Maximilian I. From the very beginning of the emergence of the Early Modern Roman-German Empire in 1495, the Lands of the Czech Crown were not part of it, neither de facto nor de iure, although in the course of the following two centuries these two neighbouring state formations happened to have a joint ruler from time to time. This formerly rather unusual perspective, yet in the author’s view, sufficiently documented by primary sources, on the constitutional development of Early Modern Medieval Europe provides a broader framework for interpretations of long-term trends in the history of the 16th and the 17th centuries.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.