Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Ententa
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the article, Grzegorz Baziur described the history and the fate of the Hungarian Soviet Republic and its aggression against neighboring Slovakia, where was proclaimed Slovak Soviet Republic. It was an attempt to “export of revolution” from Hungary to Czechoslovakia. The author describes the circumstances of raising power in Budapest by the Hungarian communists and the totalitarian system that they created during the dictatorship from March to August 1919. The author discusses the social reaction to the repression and crimes of the regime of Béla Kun: from the initial public passivity to resistance in the country, and the role of Hungarian political exile in Vienna in the fight against the communists. Further author discusses the Entente’s military intervention and liquidation of the WRR and the withdrawal of the Red Army of Hungary from Slovakia at the beginning of August 1919. In the final part of the text author has devoted the situation in Hungary after the suppression of the revolution by discussing: white terror and extend the rule of Admiral Miklos Horty as regent, which was a continuation of the monarchy in Hungary.
EN
The article discusses comments from top Krakow daily newspapers (“Czas”, “Głos Narodu”, “Naprzód” and “Nowa Reforma”) on the peace note of the Central Powers from December 1916, as well as the Entente’s unfavourable response to the note. The article analyses the press’ varying opinions on Entente’s course of action, discusses the subject of blame for starting and prolongation of the Great War, as well as reactions to notions published in the foreign press.
PL
W artykule omówione zostały komentarze głównych krakowskich dzienników („Czasu”, „Głosu Narodu”, „Naprzodu” i „Nowej Reformy”) na temat noty pokojowej Państw Centralnych z grudnia 1916 r., jak również nieprzychylnej reakcji Ententy na tę ofertę. Przeprowadzona analiza pozwoliła uwypuklić istotne kwestie, zwłaszcza wynikające z cenzuralnych uwarunkowań i orientacji politycznej, ukazać różnice w postrzeganiu działań Ententy, omówić odniesienia do problemu odpowiedzialności za wybuch i przedłużanie wojny, czy też ustosunkowanie się do koncepcji lansowanych na łamach prasy zagranicznej.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.