Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Ernest Gellner
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Book Review: Siniša Malešević (2019). "Grounded Nationalisms". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

100%
Rawski T.
Colloquia Humanistica
|
2019
|
issue 8
EN
Book Review: Siniša Malešević (2019). Grounded Nationalisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressA review of the latest book by Siniša Malešević, an established theoretician of nationalism. The review not only indicates the main theoretical innovation of this work in relation to his previous works, but also identifies Malešević's twofold theoretical contribution to contemporary theories of nationalism. Recenzja książki: Siniša Malešević (2019). Grounded Nationalisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressRecenzja najnowszej pracy Sinišy Maleševicia, uznanego teoretyka nacjonalizmu. Recenzja nie tylko wskazuje główną innowację teoretyczną tej pracy w stosunku do prac poprzednich, ale także identyfikuje dwojaki teoretyczny wkład Maleševicia we współczesne teorie nacjonalizmu.
2
Content available remote

Eastern and Central European ethnicism in light of Western studies on nation and nationalism

100%
Poniedziałek J.
Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
|
2022
|
vol. 1
111–126
EN
The aim of this article is to critically analyze the binary concept of civic nations represented by the civic communities of Western Europe and ethnic groups living in Central and Eastern Europe. The works of Ernest Gellner and John Breuilly were selected for research because they have used the indicated concept in their texts, and have become an inspiration for many researchers of national issues. The former represents a deterministic trend of sociological inquiries, the latter – social constructivism. Due to the above, they are representative examples of academic reflection on national issues widespread in Western European thought. The research proposes to reject the binary model in which civil nations were characterized as rational and striving for consensus communities and ethnic groups as irrational communities striving for conflict. The analytical model characterizing nations as political and ethnic communities was proposed instead of it.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

How Should One Write about Masters?

62%
Kola A. F.
Nauki o Wychowaniu. Studia Interdyscyplinarne
|
2019
|
vol. 8
|
issue 1
70-89
PL
Celem artykułu jest odpowiedź na pytanie, jak pisać o mistrzach? Innymi słowy, postawione pytanie dotyczy strategii narracyjnych stosowanych przez autorów piszących o mistrzach. Główna część tekstu oparta jest na pięciu przykładach: (1) John A. Hall Ernest Gellner. An Intellectual Biography (2011), (2) Anita Burdman Feferman, Solomon Feferman Alfred Tarski. Życie i logika (2009), (3) Edmund Leach Lévi-Strauss (1998), (4) Andrzej Walicki Idee i ludzie. Próba autobiografii (2010) oraz (5) Dialogues Romana Jakobsona i Krystyny Pomorskiej. Każdy tekst przedstawia inne zestawy narzędzi i technik retorycznych, relacji autora wobec mistrza oraz cel akademicki. Porównanie tych pięciu przykładów (i mniej rozbudowanych przypadków prezentowanych w artykule) stanowi konkluzję artykułu.  
EN
The aim of the paper is to answer the question: how should one write about masters? It is a question about the narrative strategies of authors writing about masters. The presented analysis is based on five examples: (1) John A. Hall’s Ernest Gellner: An Intellectual Biography, (2) Anita Burdman Feferman and Solomon Feferman’s Alfred Tarski: Life and Logic, (3) Edmund Leach’s Lévi-Strauss, (4) Andrzej Walicki’s Idee i ludzie. Próba autobiografii [Ideas and People. An Attempt at an Autobiography], and (5) Dialogues by Roman Jakobson and Krystyna Pomorska. Each text presents different rhetorical devices, authorial relations to the master, and academic aims. The paper concludes with a critical comparison of the five examples (with the addition of some other minor cases also discussed in the paper).  
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.