Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  European Public Prosecutor’s Office
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Is it Possible and Worthwhile to Promote a World-Wide Model of Criminal Procedure?

100%
Pawelec S.
Studia Iuridica
|
2016
|
vol. 67
155-163
EN
This paper canvasses some of the limitations and possible negative consequences of globalization of criminal procedure. The references to specific examples in this paper assume generally the framework of the legal systems of the European Union and its member states. This, however, is done with the idea in mind that at least some of the remarks made here could be also relevant in a wider international context, when other legal systems are taken into consideration. In the paper, particular attention is paid to possible negative consequences of globalization tendencies. Assuming this perspective was intentional, in order to draw the reader’s attention, references are made to those issues which are especially important from the point of view of legal certainty of an individual but seem to attract less attention in the literature on the subject than general analyses of the phenomenon of synergy of legal systems and the benefits stemming therefrom.
2

Is it Possible and Worthwhile to Promote a World-Wide Model of Criminal Procedure?

100%
Pawelec S.
Studia Iuridica
|
2016
|
vol. 67
155-163
EN
This paper canvasses some of the limitations and possible negative consequences of globalization of criminal procedure. The references to specific examples in this paper assume generally the framework of the legal systems of the European Union and its member states. This, however, is done with the idea in mind that at least some of the remarks made here could be also relevant in a wider international context, when other legal systems are taken into consideration. In the paper, particular attention is paid to possible negative consequences of globalization tendencies. Assuming this perspective was intentional, in order to draw the reader’s attention, references are made to those issues which are especially important from the point of view of legal certainty of an individual but seem to attract less attention in the literature on the subject than general analyses of the phenomenon of synergy of legal systems and the benefits stemming therefrom.
3
Content available remote

Zásada subsidiarity a zásada proporcionality pri prijímaní nariadenia o Európskej prokuratúre

100%
Beleš A.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2019
|
vol. 158
|
issue 5
456-471
EN
The author focuses on examining the compliance of the Regulation on the European Public Prosecutor’s Office with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. The author examines the various arguments that supported the consistency of the proposal with the above-mentioned principles, and refers to the counter-arguments. This article contributes to discussion on the need to set up the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, its scope and other legal issues that need to be addressed.
SK
V predkladanom článku sa autor zameriava na skúmanie súladu nariadenia o Európskej prokuratúre so zásadami subsidiarity a proporcionality. Autor skúma jednotlivé argumenty, ktoré podporovali súlad návrhu tohto nariadenia s uvedenými zásadami, a uvádza k tomu protiargumenty. Predkladaný článok je príspevkom k diskusii o nevyhnutnosti zriadenia Európskej prokuratúry, o šírke jej pôsobnosti a ďalších právnych otázkach, ktorých riešenie bude potrebné nájsť.
4
Content available remote

Judicial review of the acts of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - possible shortcomings and several considerations in relation to the Slovak Republic and its legislation

88%
Ružičková V.
The Lawyer Quarterly
|
2021
|
vol. 11
|
issue 4
665-681
EN
Creation of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office was from its very beginning accompanied by a wide-ranging debate regarding the most challenging issues, one of them being judicial review of its acts. This article deliberates on several groups of these acts and their review by either national courts or Court of Justice of the European Union. Where appropriate, in analyses their review in relation to the Slovak Republic. As a conclusion, it offers several considerations as to the Member States’ obligation to provide for effective judicial protection.
5
Content available remote

Projekt rozporządzenia Rady w sprawie ustanowienia Prokuratury Europejskiej

88%
Łacny J., Zreda M.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2014
|
issue 4(123)
37-64
EN
The article deals with the proposal for a Council regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Offi ce (COM(2013) 534 fi nal). The European Public Prosecutor’s Offi ce is to be set up as a new Union law enforcement authority responsible for prosecution of offences affecting the Union’s fi nancial interests. Particular attention was paid to the issue of the compatibility of the proposal with the principle of subsidiarity (Article 5 (3) TUE). The Treaty of Lisbon has made national parliaments of the Member State responsible for the observance of that principle. More than a dozen parliamentary chambers have submitted reasoned opinions through which they addressed their concerns about violation of that principle by the proposed regulation. Despite the strong reaction from the national parliaments the European Commission has decided to continue work on the proposal. From analysis of the arguments contained in the reasoned opinions submitted by the national parliaments on the proposed regulation about the European Public Prosecutor’s Offi ce it follows that the rules of the operation of the principle of subsidiarity, and the assessment criteria applied in this respect, are unclear. Most of the reasoned opinions from the national parliaments contains, apart from the allegations related strictly to the principle of subsidiarity, other objections of a legal or political nature, which do not concern that principle. The practice of national parliaments in this area is not uniform. Lack of uniformity may be one of the reasons why the Commission does not seem to hear the voice of the parliamentary chambers and is continuing the work on the proposal.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wybrane zagadnienia związane z projektem rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie ustanowienia Prokuratury Europejskiej

75%
Toruński M., Michalak K.
Studenckie Zeszyty Naukowe
|
2016
|
vol. 19
|
issue 29
EN
The Lisbon Treaty has brought major changes in the functioning of the European Union, including in the area referred to in Art. 4 section 2 point j of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which is an area of freedom, security and justice. It should first be noted that characteristic for European Union “pillar structure” has been liquidated. Former pillar III is nowadays covered by a single legal regime. Without a doubt falls conclude that the Lisbon Treaty has made a huge step towards the approximation of the laws of the Member States. Art. 86 TFEU introduces interesting novelty in this plane, providing for the possibility of establishment of an European Public Prosecutor’s Office, which is the EU body for investigating, prosecuting and bringing to justice the perpetrators of crimes against the financial interests of the European Union. Analysis of selected provisions of the Regulation on the establishment of an European Public Prosecutor’s Office leads to conclusion that draft regulation is not deprived of interpretational doubts. For instance there is a forum shopping threat. Fair trial standard and legislative technique have also been violated.
PL
Traktat z Lizbony przyniósł zasadnicze zmiany w funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, w tym w dziedzinie, o której mowa w art. 4 ust. 2 lit. j Traktatu o Funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, czyli przestrzeni wolności, bezpieczeństwa i sprawiedliwości. Należy przede wszystkim zauważyć, że zlikwidowano charakterystyczną dla TFUE strukturę filarową, a dawny filar III został objęty jednolitym reżimem prawnym. Bez wątpienia wypada stwierdzić, że Traktat z Lizbony uczynił ogromny krok w kierunku zbliżania ustawodawstw państw członkowskich. Art. 86 TFUE wprowadza interesujące novum na tej płaszczyźnie, przewidując możliwość powołania do życia Prokuratury Europejskiej, czyli unijnego organu do spraw dochodzenia, ścigania i stawiania przed sądem sprawców przestępstw przeciwko interesom finansowym Unii Europejskiej. Analiza wybranych uregulowań projektu rozporządzenia w sprawie ustanowienia Prokuratury Europejskiej pozwala na przyjęcie wniosku, że nie jest to uregulowanie pozbawione wątpliwości interpretacyjnych. Zwracają uwagę choćby takie zagadnienia, jak zjawisko forum shopping, zagrożenie dla gwarancji prawa do sądu czy wreszcie stosowana przez projektodawcę technika legislacyjna.
7
Content available remote

Přezkum činnosti Úřadu evropského veřejného žalobce

63%
Hendrych L.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2024
|
vol. 163
|
issue 4
340-353
EN
The European Public Prosecutor’s Office is a new EU body that only started its work in June 2021, which makes it all the more important to focus on its practical functioning and identify any shortcomings. As it is a supranational body with powers to investigate and prosecute criminal activities across almost all EU Member States, great emphasis should be placed on, among other things, the possibility of review of its actions. This paper aims to analyse the legal framework for review of acts of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and to highlight weaknesses in this area. A closer look at the relevant provisions reveals that review in this respect is in the hands of the CJEU, the national courts, but also the authorities within the internal structure of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. In this context, it is necessary to address the question of when a court is competent to review and when an extra-judicial body is competent. At the same time, however, it is necessary to examine whether the review of the act in question takes place at EU or national level. It follows that the issue of the review of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office’s acts is not a simple one and should be given sufficient attention. Last but not least, some de lege ferenda proposals are presented in this context.
CS
Úřad evropského veřejného žalobce je novým unijním orgánem, který svou činnost začal vykonávat teprve v červnu 2021. O to více je důležité zaměřit pozornost na jeho praktické fungování a zjistit případné nedostatky. Jelikož se jedná o nadnárodní orgán s pravomocí vyšetřovat a stíhat trestnou činnost napříč téměř všemi členskými státy EU, velký důraz by měl být kladen mimo jiné na možnost přezkumu jeho úkonů. Tato práce si proto klade za cíl analyzovat právní rámec přezkumu činnosti Úřadu evropského veřejného žalobce a upozornit na slabá místa v této oblasti. Při bližším pohledu na příslušná ustanovení zjistíme, že přezkum má v tomto ohledu v rukou Soudní dvůr Evropské unie, vnitrostátní soudy, ale rovněž orgány v rámci vnitřní struktury Úřadu evropského veřejného žalobce. V této souvislosti je třeba se zaobírat otázkou, kdy je k přezkumu příslušný soud a kdy mimosoudní orgán. Zároveň je ale třeba zkoumat, zda k přezkumu daného úkonu dochází na úrovni EU či na úrovni vnitrostátní. Z toho vyplývá, že problematika přezkumu činnosti Úřadu evropského veřejného žalobce není jednoduchá a je nutné jí věnovat dostatečnou pozornost. I proto jsou v textu představeny některé návrhy de lege ferenda.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.