Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Florian
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Przeniesienie relikwii św. Floriana do Polski (Translatio S. Floriani)

100%
Słomczyńska A.
Vox Patrum
|
1984
|
vol. 6
425-429
EN
translation
PL
tłumaczenie
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Męczeństwo św. Floriana

100%
Pławecki A.
Vox Patrum
|
1984
|
vol. 6
411-425
EN
translation
PL
tłumaczenie
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Znaniecki’s Analytic Induction as a Method of Sociological Research

85%
Tacq J.
Polish Sociological Review
|
2007
|
vol. 158
|
issue 2
187-208
EN
The Polish sociologist and philosopher Florian Znaniecki, well-known by his research together with W. I. Thomas on Polish immigrants in the United States, explicated the principles of his “analytic induction” in a later publication The Method of Sociology. This is a method in which research units are examined one by one and in which theoretical insights are adjusted to each observation. This process of continuous re-formulation of the research hypotheses completes when new observations do no longer offer new insights, i.e., when theoretical saturation takes place. In this paper a treatment of the original view of Znaniecki is offered. His starting-points-inductive approach, respect for the facts, dynamical fundamental attitude, special treatment of exceptions, attention for validity and intensional approach-are explained, as well as his formulation of analytic induction in four steps and the principle of structural dependence and the principle of causality. Starting from this original view, the advantages and disadvantages of analytic induction are balanced against each other and this method is examined with the aim of application. Critiques of the approach in the period around 1950, by Robinson, Lindesmith and Cressey and, later in time, by Peter Manning, are discussed and additional research examples from Belgium and the Netherlands serve as illustration of the arguments.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.