Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  HEIDEGGER M.
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The main thesis of this essay is that the basic phenomenon of truth (aletheia), 'the openness of the world' could be crucial for the concept of 'state of affairs' (Bewandtnis) identified with a set of practical and intersubjective rules of actions. Truth is to be identified with implicit and pre-conceptual 'knowledge-how' rather than an explicit '‘knowledge-that' articulated in theoretical statements. If such practical understanding of environment offers the only and basic access to the world, and if it simultaneously discloses meaningful entities (tools) for theoretical thinking, the idea of a theory being true, understood as being adequate or correspondent to the world, becomes quite problematic. In fact, the relation of correspondence implies a comparison of statements about present entities with practical action-rules. Since alternative articulations of the world in the terms of 'handiness' on the one hand, and 'presence' on the other, belong to two reciprocally irreducible and incomparable conceptual systems (what corresponds to eg. Quine's distinction between the 'mental' and the 'physical'), Heidegger's 'early' philosophy points to the necessity of distinguishing between a practical context of discovery and theoretical context of justification.
EN
The point of departure in the paper is the problem of Heidegger's anti-logic claims. The author undertakes a short analysis of position taken by Heidegger in the context of the problem of relation between logic and experience. When Heidegger uncovers originality of temporality, he shows the pre-conceptual origins of possible human experience and begins to undermind the dominance of logic. The resulting 'onto-logy'' the author tries to compare with Kant's transcendental philosophy as interpreted by Heidegger. Methodical function of ontology stressed in the paper makes it possible to understand Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology as a discipline that is concerned with the formal meaning of 'phenomenon'.
EN
The article shows how 'early' Heidegger approached the problem of intentionality. It begins with a reconstruction of Husserlian concept of intentionality understood as a perceptive act in which the object of experience is first constituted. The author shows subsequently that the Heideggerian understanding of intentionality does not apply to objects of perception but to meaning which can be 'grasped' in the practical attitude only. This attitude determines the pre-theoretical context of intentionality. In consequence, an overcoming of Husserl's 'methodical solipsism' is required if such a context of intentionality is to be understood. The experienced meanings express past intersubjective practices and the knowledge developed within it. An understanding based on the participation in the common world determines the perceptual situation. In consequence Husserl's idea of identifying the bare experience data becomes very questionable in this context.
EN
Understanding the intellectual structure of Heidegger's philosophy, famous for its unique language, requires inventive interpretative and translational efforts, especially in appropriately decoding its special terminological neologisms. The paper focuses on unveiling the specific aspects of Heidegger' idiolect, on the semantic and context analyses of the selected neosemantisms, the discussion of the adaptation and specialization processes of ordinary lexemes and etymons, as well as intentional using of the genetic motivation. The procedures and the various ways of constituting the terminological neologisms are presented. Attention is paid also to the terms with an atypical configuration of the word-making means, and to the unconventional two-word constructions. In addition to reconstructing the meaning of Heidegger's neosemantisms their translation is also considered. Some appropriate Slovak equivalents are suggested, mainly those related to the similar terms.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.