Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  IMPLICATION
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2015
|
vol. 70
|
issue 3
202 – 214
EN
The call to “know thyself” is neither a matter of presence and absence to self, nor the necessary or unnecessary possibility or impossibility of self-knowledge ‒ rather it is a problem. And the oracle gives a sign of this problem by implying that which is neither spoken nor concealed. But if implication is the problem of the sign, it is because it suspends the self and the very possibility of self-knowledge.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2009
|
vol. 64
|
issue 4
339-345
EN
The primary aim of the paper is to introduce a new notion of relevance of the antecedent of a true implication statement to its consequent, and to sketch a formalization of the new notion. The formalization is set up in the framework of the so called 'Logic of Strict Processes (LSP)', as articulated by the author in collaboration with J. Podrouzek. Their approach to the relevance is presented as a natural part of a wider specter of logics, including modal and relevance logics. The formalization is compared with consequence relations in normal modal logic and in the relevance logic R. In conclusion the author outlines the most important problems of LSP, which still remain open.
3
Content available remote

Filozofia logiki i formalna LOGIKA NIESYMPLIFIKACYJNA

88%
EN
Starting from philosophical intuitive conception of the relation of a kind of equivalence (called here perceptive equivalence), which is stronger that the normal equivalence (considered in the classical, 2-valued, propositional calculus, and in this paper called speculative). Then an axiomatization of a part of the classical logical calculus is proposed. It is called: non-symplificational propositional logic.
EN
This paper analyses the social differences between male and female discourse strategies in everyday discourse. The purpose of this research is to demonstrate the gender differences in conversational interaction by the methods of DA (of a material from live language usage) and sociolinguistical discourse-complementary survey. This comparative analysis searches the answers to the following questions: (1) what kind of prestart, opening, discourse-organizer, recompleter and closing strategies are popular in male-female communication, (2) which kind of turn-takings are usually used by men and women, (3) how do they use different (locutionary and illocutionary) speech-acts, face-protector strategies and conversation and politeness principles (CP and PP) in their verbal behavior, and (4) how do the informants represent of male and female communicative features as gender-markers (for example 'chattering' and 'taciturn' vs. 'a man of few words') in their mental lexicon. Summing up: this study aims at replying to the current question of daily gender-discourse: can we talk about sex-typed language or 'womanspeak' and 'manspeak', is the male-female conversation cross-cultural communication, consequently can we talk about 'genderlects'?
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.