Results found: 1

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: INAUGURAL LECTURES

Sort By:

Limit search:

Nástupní přednáška Augusta Gottlieba Meissnera. (Srovnání s K. H. Seibtem, F. A. C. Werthesem, J. J. Haanem, F. F. Wallrafem a E. Schneiderem)

100%

Hlobil T.

Listy filologické (Folia philologica)

2009

vol. 132

issue 1-2

65-93

The article compares the inaugural lecture of August Gottlieb Meissner (1753-1807), Professor of Aesthetics and Classical Literature at Prague, and the first Protestant teacher at the Faculty of Arts in Prague since the Thirty Years' War, with the inaugural lectures of professors of aesthetics, or 'die Schöne Wissenschaften', at universities in the Habsburg Monarchy and at Roman Catholic universities in the Rheinland. (Chairs of Aesthetics were not established at the Protestant universities). The prerequisites for a comparison are particularly good because the inaugural lecture of Meissner's predecessor at Prague, Karl Heinrich Seibt (1730-1806), has survived, as have those of his contemporaries, Professor Friedrich August Clement Werthes (1748-1817) at Pest, Johann Jakob Haan (whose dates of birth and death are unknown) at Trier, Ferdinand Franz Wallraf (1748-1824) at Cologne, and Eulogius Schneider (1756-1794) at Bonn. The aim of the comparison is to examine the conventions according to which professors of the Schöne Wissenschaften and aesthetics wrote their inaugural lectures, and to determine, if at all, how Meissner's lecture differed in these thematic conventions. The analyses demonstrate that the focuses of the inaugural lectures consist in clarifying the usefulness of these two taught fields for the university and society. The subsequent comparison with Meissner's lecture reveals that Meissner did not incorporate even one of the usual topics into his lecture; it appears not to bear a trace of any endeavour to legitimize aesthetics, to explain what the subject was about, what it aimed to achieve, or how it might be useful. His silence about aesthetics (unlike Classical literature, still a new, far from usual discipline) leads one to search for the reasons behind this highly unusual approach. The article concludes with two hypotheses offered in explanation.

Refine search results

1 Listy filologické (Folia philologica)

1 Hlobil T.

1 2009

Search results

Nástupní přednáška Augusta Gottlieba Meissnera. (Srovnání s K. H. Seibtem, F. A. C. Werthesem, J. J. Haanem, F. F. Wallrafem a E. Schneiderem)