Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  INVESTMENT PROJECTS
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Zarządzanie i Finanse
|
2012
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
103-112
EN
The practical application of quantitative methods in risk management in investment projects carried out in the construction industry requires specialised knowledge in this field. In particular, it’s necessary to know the advantages and disadvantages of the methods. As different investment projects are carried out in the economy, including the construction industry, every time different methods, techniques and tools need to be used to estimate risks. These issues are addressed in the paper, the aim of which is to discuss the selected methods used to estimate risk in investment projects in the construction industry, focusing on their advantages and disadvantages. The problems are discussed theoretically and presented in a synthetic way.
EN
The aspects of creation of investment climate in the Western region are examined. Factors influencing the process of attraction of investment capital in the region have been studied. A scheme of organization of investment partnership have been offered.
EN
The article focuses on the issues of measurement of cost-benefit of road investment projects both at pre-implementation stage and 'ex post', by applying cost-benefit analysis. The studies used cost-benefit analyses for modernization of Ostróda bypass in Warmia and Mazury voivodeship. As a result of the conducted studies it was established that the 'ex ante' road-bridge costs were underestimated in relation to 'ex post' costs. At the same time the savings on user and environmental costs estimated in 'ex post' analysis were higher than estimated in 'ex ante' analysis by 54,89%. Although the internal rate of return in 'ex ante' analysis was 22,95%, and in 'ex post' analysis 26,97%, this does not prove credibility of 'ex ante' analysis. The studies showed that in pre-implementation analysis there were significant inaccuracies in estimation of both the costs and the benefits related to the investment project.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.