Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Impossibilium nulla obligatio est
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Nieważne zobowiązania ex venditione. Nec emptio nec venditio sine re quae veneat potest intellegi (D. 18,1,8 pr.) Pomponiusa a Impossibilium nulla obligatio est Celsusa (D. 50,17,185

100%
Skrzywnanek-Jaworska D.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2011
|
vol. LXXXIV (84)
209-238
XX
This article is a continuation of the “Invalid obligations ex stipulatione. The meaning of Impossibilium nulla obligatio est (D. 50,17,185) of Celsus in Roman law” (Law and Economics Studies, LXXXIII/2011, pp. 205–235). It leans on the similar construction and presents in a polemic way two groups of opinions with reference to invalid obligations ex venditione. It shows, similar to invalid obligations ex stipulatione, that the adaptation of civil law achievments to the ground of Roman law does not help to understand the concept of initial impossibility in Roman law. Alternative theories on the other hand, which analyse invalid obligations ex venditione in relation to the concept of valid formation of contract, put the main meaning to the regula iuris of Pomponius: Nec emptio nec venditio sine re quae veneat potest intellegi (D. 18,1,8 pr.) and at the same time allow to negate the application of the phrase of Celsus pertaining to obligations ex venditione.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Nieważne zobowiązania ex stipulatione. Znaczenie “Impossibilium nulla obligatio est” Celsusa (D. 50,17,185) w prawie rzymskim

100%
Skrzywanek-Jaworska D.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2011
|
vol. LXXXIII (83)
205-235
EN
This article concerns the issues of invalid obligations ex stipulatione and the meaning of the Celsus phrase Impossibilium nulla obligatio est (D. 50,17,185) in Roman law. It presents in a polemic way two groups of the opinions, which can be found in the literature. The older theories adapt the civil law achievments to the ground of Roman law, what does not help to understand the concept of initial impossibility in Roman law. This research method is concentrate on the function of impossibility and does not indicate the reason of invalidity of the ex stipulatione obligations. At the same time it does not explain the meaning of the Celsus sentence. In the opposition there are in the newer literature an alternative theories to found, which analyse the invalid obligations ex stipulatione in relation to the concept of the valid formation of contract. According to these newer attempts the explanation of the meaning of the Celsus’ phrase seems to be more reliable.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.