Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Ivan Mazepa
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Baturyn – idea hetmańskiej stolicy

100%
EN
The capital city of a state is a place of considerable importance – it is the centre of politics, economy, culture and religion. This was also the case in the Ukraine where the first independent contemporary Ukrainian state was formed in the middle 17th century thanks to Bohdan Khmelnytsky, the Zaporizhian hetman. The extremely complex political situation was not conducive to the state-building process and in the following years the Ukrainian lands were peculiarly divided along the line marked by the Dnieper river into the socalled Right-bank Ukraine subordinate to the Polish Republic and the Left-bank Ukraine controlled by Russia. This division was accompanied by the emergence of two hetman seats of authority. At the turn of the 18th century the capitals of the Zaporizhian hetmans dependent on Russia were located in many places, inter alia in Subotiv, Chyhyryn, Baturyn and Hlukhiv. However, it was Baturyn – the city located at the Seym river which until the second half of the 17th century constituted an extremely important frontier in the defense system of the borderlands of the Polish Republic – was to play the most important role. All of this happened thanks to the activities of two hetmans. One was Ivan Mazepa who in his attempts to create an Ukrainian state independent from Russia at the beginning of the 18th century followed his great predecessor, Bohdan Khmelnytsky. The other was Kyrylo Rozumovsky who in the middle of that century attempted to save the last shards of autonomy granted to the Ukraine by the Russian rulers. During hetman Mazepa’s tenure Baturyn was not only the political centre of all Ukrainian lands, but it was also an important cultural and religious centre. Its vibrant development was interrupted in 1708 during the Great Northern War when in his attempt to achieve independence from Russia, Mazepa supported the Swedish king, Charles XII. At that time, czar Peter I sent strong military units to Baturyn which burned the city and murdered its inhabitants. After these events, the hetman capital was located in Hlukhiv until 1750. It was not until the decision made by the Elizaveta Petrovna, the Empress of Russia that the languishing city of Baturyn regained the status of a capital and was granted to the hetman Kyrylo Rozumovsky. Soon after this, thanks to his activities the city was rebuilt – new houses and manufacturing plants were constructed, and there were plans to open a university as well. Eventually, the plans to restore Baturyn to its former glory which it enjoyed during Mazepa’s times failed, and so did the attempts to preserve the autonomy of the Ukraine within the Russian empire.
EN
The article describes the relations of Ukrainian and Russian political and religious authorities concerning recovery of stauropegic in Kyiv Pechersk Lavra. The article also deals with preservation of law and freedom of printing in Lavra printing house, also the role of individual historical personalities in these matters – Hetman Ivan Mazepa, Archimandrite Varlaam Yasinsky, Patriarch Joachim. The basis of the research became materials found in Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts.
PL
В статье рассмотрены отношения украинских и российских политических и духовных властей в вопросах восстановления ставропигии Киево­‑Печерской лавры, сохранения права и свободы книгопечатания в лаврской типографии, роли отдельных исторических личностей в этих вопросах – гетмана Ивана Мазепы, архимандрита Варлаама Ясинского, патриарха Иоакима. Основой исследования стали материалы Российского государственного архива древних актов.
EN
Memoirs of Salomea Pichelstein-Rusetska Adventures of My Life is very interesting source of not just historical facts as such, but their reception in various segments of society. In her records there is a reflection of functioning of stereotypes, rumors and gossip about prominent political and religious leaders of the countries she visited, including Ukraine. She told the story of Ivan Mazepa and Kyrylo Rozumovskyi, his brother Oleksiy – the secret husband of  Empress of Russian Empire Elizabeth I. The work of Salomea allows us to hear in the historical perspective what official historical sources did not keep records of. Thus, gossip, rumors, prejudices and legends of XVIII century let us see a panoptical panorama of society of that period.
PL
Wspomnienia Salomeі Pichelstein-Rusieсkiej Echo na świat podane procederu podróży i życia mego awantur... Pamiętnik są bardzo interesującym źródłem nie tylko faktów historycznych, ale także ich recepcji w różnych warstwach społecznych. W Pamiętniku znalazły odzwierciedlenie liczne stereotypy, plotki o działaczach politycznych i religijnych tych krajów, które autorka odwiedziła, w tym także Ukrainy. Salomea Pilsztyn-Rusiecka opowiada o hetmanach ukraińskich Iwanie Mazepe i Kyryle Rozumowskim (Cyrylu Razumowskim) oraz jego bracie Aleksym, który był faworytem carycy Elżbiety I. Dzięki Pamiętnikom Salomeі Pichelstein-Rusieсkiej dowiadujemy się o faktach, których często nie odnajdujemy w oficjalnych źródłach historycznych. Opisane przez autorkę legendy, plotki, pogłoski i inne informacje nieoficjalne pozwalają odtworzyć panoramę życia społecznego w XVIII wieku.
RU
Мемуари Саломеї Пільштин-Русєцької Пригоди мого життя є надзвичайно цікавим джерелом не історичних фактів як таких, а їх рецепції у різних верствах суспільства. У її записах відображено функціонування стереотипів, поголосок та пліток щодо відомих політичних, релігійних діячів тих країн, які вона відвідувала, зокрема й України. Вона розповідає про гетьманів Івана Мазепу та Кирила Розумовського, його брата Олексія – потаємного чоловіка російської імператриці Єлізавети І. Твір Саломеї дозволяє почути в історичній перспективі те, чого не зберегли офіційні історичні джерела. Таким чином, плітки, пересуди, слухи, поголоски та перекази XVIII століття дозволяють побачити паноптичну панораму суспільства того періоду.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.