Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Studia Gdańskie

Authors help

  1. 1 Paulin M.

Years help

  1. 1 2013

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Justiz
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Apologie Pawel Fjodorowitsch Karamasows. Schuld bei Dostojewskij und seinen Interpreten

100%
Paulin M.
Studia Gdańskie
|
2013
|
issue 32
91-107
DE
In einer gängigen Interpretation des Romans „Die Brüder Karamasow” wird die Verantwortung für den Vatermord in unterschiedliche Komponenten zerlegt, deren jede in der Gestalt eines der vier Brüder allegorisch auskomponiert sei. Die „Komponente Smerdjakow” liege dabei als bloße physische Ausführung des Verbrechens außerhalb der Sphäre ethischer Betrachtung. Damit wird Smerdjakow aber noch in der Interpretation einmal mehr in seinem Menschsein verkannt. Eine durch Girard geschulte Lektüre zeigt hingegen, wie gekonnt Dostojewskij – ob intuitiv oder mit Absicht – diesen Charakter mit Kriterien der Opferselektion ausstattet und ihn so der Leserschaft als Sündenbock regelrecht anbietet.
EN
In a common interpretation of Dostoyevsky’s The Brothers Karamasov, Dmitri Karamasov is held guilty of murdering his father in a moral sense, while the character of Smerdyakov is put beyond the range of ethic consideration as he is seen as an allegory of the merely executing factor of the act of violence. Hence, his suicide is read as a proof that the evil itself doesn’t take over responsibility; in face of the accusation it fades away, leaving the charge of responsibility to the human moral subject. Dostoyevsky, however, seems not wanting to stress such a kind of moral hero that, in this interpretation, could be seen in Dmitri. With introducing Alexey in his preamble, he is in fact presenting us a „weak” hero, leading us to another understanding of the story. Yet Alexey is still not the weakest. It is Smerdyakov. What this article pleads for is that Smerdyakov is systematically made a scapegoat, as Dostoyevsky is illustrating in several pertinent scenes. It is only coherent that interpreters, while completely ignoring this fact, continue this scapegoating in dehumanising him by taking off him of all ethic consideration, reducing him to a personification of a merely mechanic component. By contrast, this is an apology for Smerdyakov as a human being. And as a son of Fyodor and brother of Alexey, Dmitri and Ivan.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.