Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  KOHN THEODOR
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Studia theologica
|
2010
|
vol. 12
|
issue 2
1-19
EN
In 1904 while in Rome Theodor Kohn had resigned as the archbishop of Olomouc. After his resignation he moved to Rindbach near Ebensee and in October 1904 he moved again to Ehrehnausen in Styria. There he had bought castle Ehrenhausen. Until his death in 1915 he lived there with his secretary Frantisek Botek, Theodor Vavrusa and his servants from Moravia. Kohn has renovated the Eggenberger mausoleum, which was a component of the castle Ehrenhausen, and after his death he was laid to rest there. Kohn's heirs gave the Eggenberger mausoleum to the Land Steiermark.
Studia theologica
|
2009
|
vol. 11
|
issue 1
42-59
EN
The Nunciature in Vienna ensured communication between all dioceses of Austria-Hungary and the Holy See. During the period of the episcopate of ThDr Theodor Kohn as the archbishop of Olomouc/Olmütz (1892-1904), four nuncios took turns in Vienna: Galimberti (1887-1893), Agliardi (1893-1896), Taliani (1896-1903) and Di Belmonte (1904-1911). From their reports to the Vatican, we can find out the views of these nuncios and also those of the Holy See on the particular significant events in the archdiocese of Olomouc concerning Theodor Kohn, such as his election as the archbishop of Olomouc (Theodor Kohn had no aristocratic ancestry, but Jewish and Czech commoner's origins) and the subsequent affairs (fueled by Czech-German nationality conflicts etc.) - all that ending in the resignation of Theodor Kohn as the archbishop of Olomouc. We can also recognize from the reports that the nuncios and the Holy See had good information and that they endeavoured to find the best solution of the serious state of affairs in the archdiocese of Olomouc.
Studia theologica
|
2012
|
vol. 14
|
issue 1
40–64
EN
Representatives of secular power were always interested in retaining control over the occupation of the Episcopal See. This was also true in the Habsburg monarchy, where the bishops were appointed by the Emperor and the Pope had to either confirm or not confirm the candidate proposed by the Emperor. The Archdiocese of Olomouc was a special case. The chapter of Olomouc had the privilege of free election of the Archbishops, who were either elected from the canons of the chapter or the canons postulated another candidate. During the last truly free election, Archbishop Theodor Kohn was elected. His episcopate was not particularly successful and he had to resign (1904). During the negotiations concerning his resignation, The Holy See and government in Vienna began to look for a suitable candidate for the vacant see. Both sides agreed on Bishop Bauer, who was consequently appointed archbishop of Olomouc. After the death of Archbishop Bauer (died 1915), the Archbishop of Prague Skrbenský was postulated to the post of Archbishop of Olomouc.
Studia theologica
|
2011
|
vol. 13
|
issue 3
42-59
EN
In 1903, a number of articles were published which criticized Archbishop Kohn. One exception appeared, however, when Josef Svatopluk Machar criticized his opponents. Theodor Kohn resigned in Rome in 1904 and then settled in Ehrenhausen (Steiermark). J. S. Machar visited Kohn in Ehrenhausen in 1909. This visit did not remain unnoticed and aroused the interest of the Archdiocese of Olomouc and of the Holy See in Rome. Machar promised to publish nothing about this visit and about Kohn, “except from the perspective of history”. He released his reminiscences of Kohn in 1927.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.