Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Księga Zachariasza
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
The Biblical Annals
|
1966
|
vol. 13
|
issue 1
71-80
PL
L’article présente deux études les plus récentes: P . Lamarche Zacharie IX-X IV. Structure littéraire en messianisme (Études Bibliques), Paris 1961 et de B. Otzen, Studien über Deuterosacharja (Acta Theologica Danica, vol. VI), Copenhagen 1964, dont les auteurs pensent pouvoir resoudre le problème assez difficile de la composition littéraire de Zacharie 9-14. P. Lamarche recourt à l’hypothèse d’une structure littéraire artificielle faisant appel à des complexes harmonieusement groupés à l’aide d’articulations et de parallelismes. B. Otzen trouve, par contre, en Deutéro-Zacharie les quatres traditions (Zach 9-10, 11, 12-13 e t 14) découvrant à la base de chacune d’elles le „kultisch-liturgisches Schema”. L’article a pour but d’attirer l’attention sur le fait que selon B. Stade (1881) ce sont les premiers exégètes qui parlent de l’unité de composition littéraire dans Zacharie 9-14. Ils en soulignent le caractère eschatologique e t apocalyptique par les groupements des vers qui s’organisent à l’intérieur en une construction littéraire harmonieuse et très expressive en chiasme. C’est justement leur méthode qui nous aide à nous familiariser avec cette manière de composer et à pénétrer dans la pensée de l’auteur inspiré. Ces études par l’analyse des structures de chaque partie et du livre tout entier prouvent que Zacharie 9-14 appartient à la littérature de l’époque perse.
The Biblical Annals
|
2017
|
vol. 7
|
issue 3
381-387
EN
Book review: William Randolph Bynum, The Fourth Gospel and the Scriptures. Illuminating the Form and Meaning of Scriptural Citation in John 19:37 (Supplements to Novum Testamentum 144; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2012). Pp. 213. EUR 116. ISBN 978-90-04-22843-6 (hardback). ISBN 978-90-04-22914 (e-book)  
The Biblical Annals
|
2016
|
vol. 6
|
issue 2
317-322
PL
Book Review: Tomasz Tułodziecki, Tożsamość nowego Izraela w Księdze Zachariasza. Studium egzegetyczno-teologiczne Za 1–8 (Scripta Theologica Thoruniensia 33; Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika 2014). Ss. 340. PLN 48. ISBN 9788323133636.
PL
Pielgrzymowanie jest wpisane w tradycję narodu wybranego, a także chrześcijan. Teksty biblijne Starego i Nowego Testamentu podejmują ów temat. Dostrzeżenie wątku pielgrzymowania w tradycji apokaliptycznej wydaje się szczególnie interesujące. Artykuł prezentuje dwa teksty biblijne: perykopę z Księgi Zachariasza (por. Za 14) oraz z Apokalipsy św. Jana (por. Ap 7,9-17), które nawiązują do Święta Namiotów i związanego z nim pielgrzymowania do Jerozolimy. Poprzez swoją specyfikę nadają one pielgrzymowaniu wymiaru eschatologicznego.
EN
Pilgrimage is inscribed in the tradition of the Chosen People and also Christians. The biblical texts of the Old and New Testaments deal with this theme. Seeing the theme of pilgrimage in the apocalyptic tradition seems particularly interesting. The article presents two biblical texts: the pericope from the Book of Zechariah (Zechariah 14) and the Apocalypse of St. John (Rev 7:9-17), which refer to the Feast of Tabernacles and the pilgrimage to Jerusalem associated with it. Through their specificity, they give the pilgrimage an eschatological dimension.
EN
In four sections, the article deals with four specific issues related to the use of the Book of Zechariah in the Fourth Gospel. First, nine different ways in which the Old Testament is employed in John’s Gospel are presented. In this section the article aims to justify focusing on the use of a single OT book in John’s Gospel, an approach which appeals to many scholars as the most appropriate way of dealing with the broader issue of the use of the OT in the Fourth Gospel. Such a seemingly narrow methodological choice enables the exegete to investigate virtually all possible uses of a particular OT text (book), applying the appropriate attention and thoroughness. Second, the article discusses two major methodological problems connected with the study of the OT in the Fourth Gospel, namely (1) the absence of careful, widely accepted definitions for the literary devices of quote, allusion, and echo; and, related to this, (2) the elusive nature of any objective criteria for identifying allusions and echoes. The article also broaches the issue of the rightly questioned legitimacy of using the term “intertextuality” within the realm of biblical studies employing the historical-critical method. As to the problem of definitions, Ben-Porat’s definition of literary allusion, together with Sommer’s approach to the phenomenon called an echo, are adopted in this article. Thirdly, the article presents a case study of one particular allusion in the Fourth Gospel, namely the mention of the fig tree in the narrative of the call of the first disciples in John 1:45-51. Indeed, the question of why Nathaniel confesses Jesus to be the Son of God and the king of Israel (1:49) following Jesus’ statement that he saw him under the fig tree (1:48) stands as a perennial crux interpretum in Johannine studies. Seeing an allusion to the prophecy of Zec 3:10 seems to solve this problem convincingly. Fourth, the article discusses the use of explicit quotations from Zechariah in the Fourth Gospel. The current study reveals that there are two basic focal points of the major Johannine references to Zechariah: (1) the cleansing narrative (Jn 2:13-22), with its references to Zec 6:12-13 and 14:21, and the triumphal entry narrative (Jn 12:12-16), which quotes Zec 9:9, both refer to the rebuilding of the temple; and (2) Jn 7:38, quoting Zec 14:8, and Jn 19:30-37, quoting Zec 12:10 both relate to the gift of the Spirit. Taken together, the references to Zechariah in the Fourth Gospel express two facets of a single, fundamental Johannine theological paradigm, i.e. that Jesus is the new temple: (1) the cleansing and rebuilding of the temple, understood as both Jesus’ body and the community of believers, and (2) the gift of the Spirit flowing out of the new temple, Jesus’ body.
The Biblical Annals
|
2012
|
vol. 2
|
issue 1
153-194
PL
The explicit references to the Scripture (γραφή) in the Johannine cleansing narrative in 2:22 as well as in the Johannine narrative about the empty tomb in 20:9 were always a perplexing mystery which raised a plethora of scholarly proposals. The article presents an argument in favor of Zech 6:12-13 as a scriptural referent in both these occurrences of γραφή. The Zechariah oracle about the future rebuilding of the temple by a messianic king perfectly dovetails with the Johannine Temple-Christology which depicts the resurrection of Jesus as the rebuilding of the temple by the King-Messiah.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.